Literature DB >> 20451309

Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index outcomes for orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients.

S Ponduri1, A Pringle, H Illing, P A Brennan.   

Abstract

The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index is commonly used to evaluate occlusal outcomes after orthodontic treatment. We compared the PAR outcomes of 40 consecutively treated orthodontic patients and 40 orthognathic patients to evaluate the standard of care given. A patient-centred questionnaire was used to examine patients' perceptions of the benefits of orthognathic treatment. PAR scores of orthodontic and orthognathic patients improved by a mean of 77% and 74%, respectively, after treatment indicating that excellent to good occlusal results were achieved for both groups. A high quality occlusal outcome is important for all patients as good intercuspation at the end of treatment is thought to improve stability. Most orthognathic patients reported improvements in their dental and facial appearance and thought that the treatment had been beneficial.
Copyright © 2010 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20451309     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  6 in total

1.  Influence of single-jaw surgery vs bimaxillary surgery on the outcome and duration of combined orthodontic-surgical treatment.

Authors:  Ian Arad; Jasveer Jandu; Paul Bassett; Padhraig S Fleming
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Did the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic affect orthodontic treatment outcomes? A clinical evaluation using the objective grading system and Peer Assessment Rating index.

Authors:  Pamir Meriç; Julia Naoumova
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Clinical outcomes of lingual fully customized vs labial straight wire systems : Assessment based on American Board of Orthodontics criteria.

Authors:  Fadi Ata-Ali; Javier Ata-Ali; Alicia Lanuza-Garcia; Marcela Ferrer-Molina; Maria Melo; Eliseo Plasencia
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Komil Tintodana; Sanjeev Verma; Satinder P Singh; Vinay Kumar; Raj K Verma; Nameksh R Bhupali
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2020-11-02

5.  Assessing the outcome of orthognathic surgery by three-dimensional soft tissue analysis.

Authors:  L Vittert; S Katina; A Ayoub; B Khambay; A W Bowman
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Quality of orthodontic care-A multicenter cohort study in Germany : Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors.

Authors:  I Graf; N C Bock; T Bartzela; V Röper; U Schumann; K Reck; H Christ; K Höfer; U Fritz; D Wiechmann; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; M Wolf; S Ruf; B Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.341

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.