Literature DB >> 20451149

Recruiting palliative patients for a large qualitative study: some ethical considerations and staff dilemmas.

Heather Tan1, Anne Wilson, Ian Olver, Christopher Barton.   

Abstract

This article reports on the processes of staff members in referring patients to a study that explored the experience of palliative patients, family members, and health professionals with the implementation of a family meeting model as an instrument of spiritual care. The reported qualitative study was undertaken in two large metropolitan Australian hospitals. Criteria other than those set by the study protocol were employed by staff members referring patients. These included subjective opinions of who was suitable to refer and perceptions of patients' attitudes to religion or spirituality. Such practices raise ethical issues and may compromise studies that have received ethics approval. Crown Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20451149     DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2010.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Explore (NY)        ISSN: 1550-8307            Impact factor:   1.775


  4 in total

1.  The experience of palliative patients and their families of a family meeting utilised as an instrument for spiritual and psychosocial care: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Heather M Tan; Anne Wilson; Ian Olver; Christopher Barton
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.234

2.  Inviting parents to take part in paediatric palliative care research: a mixed-methods examination of selection bias.

Authors:  Joanna C Crocker; Emma Beecham; Paula Kelly; Andrew P Dinsdale; June Hemsley; Louise Jones; Myra Bluebond-Langner
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  The impact of the carer support needs assessment tool (CSNAT) in community palliative care using a stepped wedge cluster trial.

Authors:  Samar M Aoun; Gunn Grande; Denise Howting; Kathleen Deas; Chris Toye; Lakkhina Troeung; Kelli Stajduhar; Gail Ewing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A screening tool for predicting gatekeeping behaviour.

Authors:  Austyn Snowden; Jenny Young
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2017-05-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.