Literature DB >> 20450502

Total prostatectomy within 6 weeks of a prostate biopsy: is it safe?

Kishore T Adiyat1, Manoharan Murugesan, Devendar Katkoori, Ahmed Eldefrawy, Mark S Soloway.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many urologists recommend a six-week time interval between a prostate biopsy and a total prostatectomy (TP) to allow the biopsy induced inflammation to subside. Our aim was to assess whether the time interval between prostate biopsy and TP has an impact on the surgical outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent a TP by a single surgeon from 1992 to 2008. The patients were divided into two groups according to the time interval between biopsy and TP, Group 1 < or = 6 weeks and Group 2 > 6 weeks. Relevant perioperative variables and outcome were analyzed.
RESULTS: 923 patients were included. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the surgeons' ability to perform a bilateral nerve sparing procedure. Those who had a TP within six weeks of the biopsy were less likely to have a bilateral nerve sparing procedure. No significant difference was noted in the other variables, which included Gleason score, surgical margin status, estimated blood loss, post-operative infection, incontinence, erectile function, and biochemical recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: TP can be safely performed without any increase in complications within 6 weeks of a prostate biopsy. However, a TP within six weeks of a biopsy significantly reduced the surgeon's perception of whether a bilateral nerve sparing procedure was performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20450502     DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382010000200007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  6 in total

1.  Does time interval between prostate biopsy and surgery affect outcomes of radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Li; Qing Jiang; Qiubo Li; Yuanfeng Zhang; Liang Gao
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Basis for the use of localized hypothermia during radical pelvic surgery.

Authors:  David S Finley
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Interval from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy does not affect immediate operative outcomes for open or minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Bumsoo Park; Seol Ho Choo; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Can radical prostatectomy shortly after prostate biopsy affect intra-operative and postoperative outcomes?

Authors:  Lucio Dell'Atti; Gaetano Capparelli; Stefano Papa; Carmelo Ippolito
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Impact of time from biopsy to surgery on complications, functional and oncologic outcomes following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mary E Westerman; Vidit Sharma; George C Bailey; Stephen A Boorjian; Igor Frank; Matthew T Gettman; R Houston Thompson; Matthew K Tollefson; Robert Jeffrey Karnes
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Short interval of biopsy to robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not render any adverse effects on the perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Minke He; Yaohui Li; Zhuoyi Xiang; Li-An Sun; Yanjun Zhu; Xiaoyi Hu; Jianming Guo; Hang Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.