Literature DB >> 20450402

The influence of the bucco-palatal distance on sinus augmentation outcomes.

Gustavo Avila1, Hom-Lay Wang, Pablo Galindo-Moreno, Carl E Misch, Robert A Bagramian, Ivan Rudek, Erika Benavides, Ildefonso Moreno-Riestra, Thomas Braun, Rodrigo Neiva.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maxillary sinus augmentation is one of the most reliable implant site development options to increase vertical bone height. However, graft consolidation requires adequate angiogenesis and migration of cells involved in osteogenesis and bone remodeling. It is speculated that these biologic events are greatly determined by the dimensions of the maxillary sinus cavity. Hence, the purpose of this study is to assess the influence of the distance from the lateral to the medial wall of the maxillary sinus on the outcomes of sinus augmentation procedures.
METHODS: A total of 25 patients in need of sinus augmentation were recruited for the study. After initial examination, customized radiographic and surgical guides were fabricated and a cone-beam computerized tomography scan was obtained per patient. The bucco-palatal distance (BPD) was measured at 8, 10, and 12 mm from the alveolar crest. Sinus grafting was performed by a lateral window approach using a particulated allograft material. Patients were followed-up for 6 months. At the time of implant placement, bone core biopsies were harvested using the radiographic-surgical guide. Sections of the bone cores at 8, 10, and 12 mm from the alveolar crest were histomorphometrically analyzed. The proportion of vital bone (%VB) was correlated with the BPD using a statistical model.
RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent sinus augmentation for a total of 24 sinuses; however, the data analyzed contained only one sinus per patient. One sinus developed an infection after grafting, resulting in a 96% success rate for the sinus grafting procedure. Twenty sinuses were used in the final statistical analysis. Histomorphometric analysis revealed that mean %VB was 22.71 +/- 19.08, mean percent of remaining allograft was 23.39 +/- 20.85, and average percent of non-mineralized connective tissue was 53.90 +/- 13.23. Analysis of the correlation between %VB and BPD by linear regression, using the actual values of BPD showed a strong negative association (R(2) = 0.141; P <0.001).
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the %VB formation after maxillary sinus augmentation is inversely proportional to the sinus BPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20450402     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  18 in total

1.  [Effect of anatomical parameters of maxillary sinus on the outcomes of transcrestal sinus lift].

Authors:  Xiao-Fei Zheng; An-Chun Mo; Juan-Fang Zhu; Su-Ping Wang; Ya-Jing Du; Yong-Zhi Yao
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Histomorphometric evaluation of different graft associations for maxillary sinus elevation in wide antral cavities: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Mauricio Marcelo Harlos; Thiago Bezerra da Silva; Pedro Giorgetti Montagner; Lucas Novaes Teixeira; Adriana Vanderley Gomes; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 3.  Relative performance of various biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bálint Trimmel; Noémi Gede; Péter Hegyi; Zsolt Szakács; Gyöngyi Anna Mezey; Eszter Varga; Márton Kivovics; Lilla Hanák; Zoltán Rumbus; György Szabó
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Inferior alveolar nerve trajectory, mental foramen location and incidence of mental nerve anterior loop.

Authors:  M Velasco-Torres; M Padial-Molina; G Avila-Ortiz; R García-Delgado; A Catena; P Galindo-Moreno
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-09-01

5.  Efficacy of stem cell allograft in maxillary sinus bone regeneration: a randomized controlled clinical and blinded histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Josh Whitt; Mohanad Al-Sabbagh; Dolphus Dawson; Ehab Shehata; Moly Housley-Smith; Alejandro Tezanos; Ahmad Kutkut
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-06-29

6.  Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Maxillary Molar Extraction in Reducing Crestal Bone Resorption and Sinus Pneumatization: A Multicenter Prospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Teresa Lombardi; Fabio Bernardello; Federico Berton; Davide Porrelli; Antonio Rapani; Alvise Camurri Piloni; Luca Fiorillo; Roberto Di Lenarda; Claudio Stacchi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Sinus Membrane Elevation with Heterologous Cortical Lamina: A Randomized Study of a New Surgical Technique for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation without Bone Graft.

Authors:  Antonio Scarano; Pablo Santos de Oliveira; Tonino Traini; Felice Lorusso
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  The Influence of Residual Alveolar Bone Height on Graft Composition after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Xenografts: A Histomorphometric Comparative Study.

Authors:  Silvio Taschieri; Moses Ofer; Stefano Corbella; Tiziano Testori; Claudia Dellavia; Carlos Nemcovsky; Elena Canciani; Luca Francetti; Massimo Del Fabbro; Gianluca Tartaglia
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Management of Schneiderian Membrane Perforations during Sinus Augmentation Procedures: A Preliminary Comparison of Two Different Approaches.

Authors:  Horia Mihail Barbu; Stefania Andrada Iancu; Iasmin Jarjour Mirea; Michele Davide Mignogna; Nachum Samet; José Luis Calvo-Guirado
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With or Without Barrier Membrane Coverage of the Lateral Window: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Daniel Deluiz; Kirsten Duch; Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2019-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.