Literature DB >> 20449697

Glycemic control and long-acting insulin analog utilization in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Edith M Heintjes1, Trine L Thomsen, Fernie J A Penning-van Beest, Torsten E Christensen, Ron M C Herings.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to compare glycemic control, insulin utilization, and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiated on insulin detemir (IDet) or insulin glargine (IGlar) in a real-life setting in the Netherlands.
METHODS: Insulin-naïve patients with T2D, starting treatment with IDet or IGlar between January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2008, were selected from the PHARMO data network. Glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]), target rates (HbA1c <7%), daily insulin dose, and weight gain were analyzed comparing IDet and IGlar for patients with available HbA1c levels both at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Analysis of all eligible patients (AEP) and a subgroup of patients without treatment changes (WOTC) in the follow-up period were adjusted for patient characteristics, propensity scores, and baseline HbA1c.
RESULTS: A total of 127 IDet users and 292 IGlar users were included in the WOTC analyses. The mean HbA1c dropped from 8.4%-8.6% at baseline to 7.4% after 1 year. Patients at HbA1c goal increased from 9% at baseline to 32% for IDet and 11% to 35% for IGlar, which was not significantly different (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.46, 1.24). Weight gain (n=90) was less among IDet users (+0.4 kg) than among IGlar users (+1.1 kg), albeit not significant. The AEP analysis (252 IDet + 468 IGlar users) showed similar results with 33%-36% at goal (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57, 1.16), and median daily insulin doses of 25 IU/day (P=0.70).
CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between users of IDet and IGlar with respect to glycemic control and insulin dose in a real-life setting. The low proportion of patients on target at baseline may indicate that insulin therapy is initiated too late. Moreover, the observation that one-third of the patients reached HbA1c target at follow-up may indicate that basal insulin analogs are not titrated intensively enough.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20449697     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-010-0020-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  5 in total

1.  HARMONY 4: randomised clinical trial comparing once-weekly albiglutide and insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin with or without sulfonylurea.

Authors:  Peter N Weissman; Molly C Carr; June Ye; Deborah T Cirkel; Murray Stewart; Caroline Perry; Richard Pratley
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus with insulin detemir, a long-acting insulin analog.

Authors:  Jason R Young; Carrie McAdam-Marx
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2010-12-05

3.  Clinical and financial outcomes of switching insulin glargine to insulin detemir in a veteran population with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bernadette D Asias; Eileen M Stock; Nancy L Small; Katerine E Getchell; Jagruti R Patel; Jennifer D Krause; Staci Cavness; Cassidy L Dzenowski; Mia Ta
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2015-06-26

4.  Insulin analogues dosing and costs - comparing real-life daily doses of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  Marie Jakobsen; Mette Dalsgaard; Morten Hørmann; Daniél Vega Møller
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.763

5.  Probability of Achieving Glycemic Control with Basal Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Practice in the USA.

Authors:  Lawrence Blonde; Luigi Meneghini; Xuejun Victor Peng; Anders Boss; Kyu Rhee; Alka Shaunik; Supriya Kumar; Sidhartha Balodi; Claire Brulle-Wohlhueter; Rory J McCrimmon
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 2.945

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.