Literature DB >> 20449562

[Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI): translation and cross-cultural adaptation for use by German speakers].

S Drerup1, F Angst, S Griffin, M P Flury, B R Simmen, J Goldhahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcome assessment after orthopaedic interventions is becoming more and more important. However, there are no disease-specific instruments for patient self-assessment of shoulder instability. The goal of our study was to translate and test the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) using a standardised approach. The guidelines of the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons were used for the translation and cross-cultural adaptation process. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Understanding was tested in 20 healthy subjects, and reliability and validity were quantified in 30 patients with shoulder instability. The quality of the translated version was described using the criteria of homogeneity, reliability, and construct validity.
RESULTS: The test-retest reliability of the total score [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), 0.87] and of the subscores with the ICC (sports, leisure, and work 0.73; sensitivity 0.81; physical symptoms 0.82; and behaviour 0.90) was high. The internal consistency of the total scale was also high (Cronbach's alpha 0.89).
CONCLUSIONS: The WOSI covers a broad range of symptoms and impaired functioning in patients with shoulder instability. The German translation shows good results regarding understanding, homogeneity, reliability, and validity. Therefore, it is a useful instrument for self-assessment in patients with shoulder instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20449562     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-010-1610-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  13 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total shoulder arthroplasty: usefulness and validity of subjective outcome measures.

Authors:  Felix Angst; Géza Pap; Anne F Mannion; Daniel B Herren; André Aeschlimann; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Beat R Simmen
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-10-15

Review 3.  Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Deyo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function.

Authors:  R R Richards; K N An; L U Bigliani; R J Friedman; G M Gartsman; A G Gristina; J P Iannotti; V C Mow; J A Sidles; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data.

Authors:  E K Breivik; G A Björnsson; E Skovlund
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Lessons learned during the cross-cultural adaptation of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder form into German.

Authors:  Jörg Goldhahn; Felix Angst; Susann Drerup; Geza Pap; Beat R Simmen; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  A concept for comprehensively measuring health, function and quality of life following orthopaedic interventions of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Beat R Simmen; Felix Angst; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Daniel B Herren; Geza Pap; Andre Aeschlimann; Jörg Goldhahn
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  Alexandra Kirkley; Sharon Griffin; Katie Dainty
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 10.  Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  S D M Bot; C B Terwee; D A W M van der Windt; L M Bouter; J Dekker; H C W de Vet
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  4 in total

1.  Multicomponent stretching and rubber band strengthening exercises do not reduce overuse shoulder injuries: a cluster randomised controlled trial with 579 handball athletes.

Authors:  Leonard Achenbach; Gunnar Huppertz; Florian Zeman; Johannes Weber; Patrick Luig; Maximilian Rudert; Werner Krutsch
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2022-03-11

2.  The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score; validation in Dutch and first-time assessment of its smallest detectable change.

Authors:  Just A van der Linde; Derk A van Kampen; Loes W A H van Beers; Derek F P van Deurzen; Caroline B Terwee; W Jaap Willems
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Measurement properties of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index in Dutch patients with shoulder instability.

Authors:  Just A van der Linde; W Jaap Willems; Derk A van Kampen; Loes W A H van Beers; Derek F P van Deurzen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Instability and results after non-operative treatment of large anterior glenoid rim fractures: is there a correlation between fragment size or displacement and recurrence?

Authors:  Matthias Königshausen; Simon Pätzholz; Marlon Coulibaly; Volkmar Nicolas; Marc Vandemeulebroecke; Thomas Armin Schildhauer; Dominik Seybold
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.928

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.