Literature DB >> 20447954

Current evidence for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Cécile Gaujoux-Viala1, Josef S Smolen, Robert Landewé, Maxime Dougados, Tore K Kvien, Emilio Martin Mola, Marieke Scholte-Voshaar, Piet van Riel, Laure Gossec.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-a first step in a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) initiative to produce recommendations for the management of RA.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library was performed up to January 2009. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy of synthetic DMARDs (vs placebo or other synthetic DMARDs) on signs and symptoms, disability and/or radiographic structural damage in patients with RA were selected. Studies of biological agents or glucocorticoids were excluded. A pooled effect size (ES) was calculated by meta-analysis. Safety and the occurrence of infections and neoplasia was also assessed.
RESULTS: 97 RCTs (14 159 patients) were analysed for efficacy. The pooled analysis indicated that methotrexate (MTX) was more efficacious in reducing signs and symptoms, disability and radiographic structural damage than other synthetic DMARDs pooled: ES for swollen joint count (SJC) versus pooled DMARDs=1.42 (95% CI 0.65 to 2.18). Leflunomide appeared to be as effective as MTX. Sulfasalazine and injectable gold were efficacious in reducing signs and symptoms and structural damage. Ciclosporin, minocycline, tacrolimus and hydroxychloroquine showed some efficacy in reducing SJC. Auranofin and D-penicillamine showed no significant superiority over placebo. The risks of cancer and of infection were increased with cyclophosphamide and azathioprine.
CONCLUSIONS: MTX was well-tolerated and effective in reducing signs and symptoms, disability and structural damage. A comparison with other synthetic DMARDs was in favour of MTX, though at the tested doses MTX and leflunomide were equally effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20447954     DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.127225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  38 in total

1.  Rheumatoid arthritis: Guidelines for RA therapy-avoiding hamartia.

Authors:  Arthur Kavanaugh
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Pharmacotherapy: How well can we compare different biologic agents for RA?

Authors:  Josef S Smolen
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Assessment of the treat-to-target strategy in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. A prospective study on efficacy and safety in a Saudi population.

Authors:  R H A Mohammed; H H Kewan; M Bukhari
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Effectiveness of maintenance therapy with methotrexate compared with leflunomide for patients with RA having achieved disease control with both these drugs: results of a predefined sub-analysis of CareRA, a pragmatic RCT.

Authors:  Veerle Stouten; Stijn Michiels; René Westhovens; Diederik De Cock; Amy Belba; Sofia Pazmino; Kristien Van der Elst; Johan Joly; Patrick Verschueren
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  [German 2012 guidelines for the sequential medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Adapted EULAR recommendations and updated treatment algorithm].

Authors:  K Krüger; J Wollenhaupt; K Albrecht; R Alten; M Backhaus; C Baerwald; W Bolten; J Braun; H Burkhardt; G Burmester; M Gaubitz; A Gause; E Gromnica-Ihle; H Kellner; J Kuipers; A Krause; H-M Lorenz; B Manger; H Nüßlein; H-G Pott; A Rubbert-Roth; M Schneider; C Specker; H Schulze-Koops; H-P Tony; S Wassenberg; U Müller-Ladner
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Creative trial design in RA: optimizing patient outcomes.

Authors:  Maya H Buch; Sue Pavitt; Mahesh Parmar; Paul Emery
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 20.543

7.  Development of the American College of Rheumatology's Rheumatoid Arthritis Electronic Clinical Quality Measures.

Authors:  Jinoos Yazdany; Mark Robbins; Gabriela Schmajuk; Sonali Desai; Diane Lacaille; Tuhina Neogi; Jasvinder A Singh; Mark Genovese; Rachel Myslinski; Natalie Fisk; Melissa Francisco; Eric Newman
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 8.  Interleukin-6 inhibition for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a review of tocilizumab therapy.

Authors:  Aarat M Patel; Larry W Moreland
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 9.  EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Robert Landewé; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Maxime Dougados; Paul Emery; Cecile Gaujoux-Viala; Simone Gorter; Rachel Knevel; Jackie Nam; Monika Schoels; Daniel Aletaha; Maya Buch; Laure Gossec; Tom Huizinga; Johannes W J W Bijlsma; Gerd Burmester; Bernard Combe; Maurizio Cutolo; Cem Gabay; Juan Gomez-Reino; Marios Kouloumas; Tore K Kvien; Emilio Martin-Mola; Iain McInnes; Karel Pavelka; Piet van Riel; Marieke Scholte; David L Scott; Tuulikki Sokka; Guido Valesini; Ronald van Vollenhoven; Kevin L Winthrop; John Wong; Angela Zink; Désirée van der Heijde
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 10.  Treat-to-target in spondyloarthritis: implications for clinical trial designs.

Authors:  James Cheng-Chung Wei
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.