Literature DB >> 20447824

Psychological distress in cancer from survivorship to end of life care: prevalence, associated factors and clinical implications.

Wei Gao1, Michael I Bennett, Daniel Stark, Scott Murray, Irene J Higginson.   

Abstract

AIMS: Understanding how psychological distress changes over the cancer trajectory is essential to target interventions and care, but is little researched because of difficulties in conducting longitudinal studies. We aimed to determine the prevalence of psychological distress, its associated factors and clinical implications at three different stages in the cancer trajectory. DATA AND METHODS: Cancer patients from cancer outpatients (n=200), the general community (n=364) and specialist palliative care (n=150) were included. Psychological distress was assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Associated factors and clinical prognostic value were investigated using logistic regression and Cox regression.
RESULTS: Overall prevalence of psychological distress was 24.5% (95% CI: 18.5-30.5%) in cancer outpatients during or soon after treatment, 16.5% (95%CI: 12.7-20.3%) in the general community and rose to 59.3% (95%CI: 51.4-67.2%) in specialist palliative care. Cancer type was the best predictor for psychological distress in both specialist palliative care (PR(prostate cancer versus other cancers)=5.61; 95%CI: 1.21-26.04; p=0.008) and general community samples (PR(lung cancer versus other cancers)=3.64; 95%CI: 1.08-12.35; p=0.003). Higher scores on GHQ-12 items predicted shorter survival in palliative care patients and showed weak protective or no association with survival in cancer outpatients.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing oncological treatment and then again as they approaching death have increased levels of psychological distress. Assessing psychological distress through survivorship and especially at these times may identify unmet psychological needs and allow targeted psychological support. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20447824     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  33 in total

1.  Video Material as an Effective Educational Tool to Address Informational and Educational Needs of Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Dilshad Nathoo
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Opinions of the Dutch public on palliative sedation: a mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Hilde T H van der Kallen; Natasja J H Raijmakers; Judith A C Rietjens; Alex A van der Male; Herman J Bueving; Johannes J M van Delden; Agnes van der Heide
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  A Bibliometric Analysis of the Landscape of Cancer Rehabilitation Research (1992-2016).

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Catherine M Alfano; Christopher W Belter; Ralph Nitkin; Alison Cernich; Karen Lohmann Siegel; Leighton Chan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Physical and psychological health in rare cancer survivors.

Authors:  Nora K Horick; Adoma Manful; Jan Lowery; Susan Domchek; Patricia Moorman; Constance Griffin; Kala Visvanathan; Claudine Isaacs; Anita Y Kinney; Dianne M Finkelstein
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Effectiveness of perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Attila Vagvolgyi; Zsolt Rozgonyi; Maria Kerti; Paul Vadasz; Janos Varga
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Population-level trends in posttreatment cancer survivors' concerns and associated receipt of care: results from the 2006 and 2010 LIVESTRONG surveys.

Authors:  Ellen Burke Beckjord; Kerry A Reynolds; G J van Londen; Rachel Burns; Reema Singh; Sarah R Arvey; Stephanie A Nutt; Ruth Rechis
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2014

7.  The association of presurgery psychological symptoms with postsurgery pain among cancer patients receiving implantable devices for pain management.

Authors:  Carrie J Aigner; Mike Hernandez; Lakshmi Koyyalagunta; Diane Novy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Psychological flexibility correlates with patient-reported outcomes independent of clinical or sociodemographic characteristics.

Authors:  Nicholas J Hulbert-Williams; Lesley Storey
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Triadic treatment decision-making in advanced cancer: a pilot study of the roles and perceptions of patients, caregivers, and oncologists.

Authors:  Thomas W LeBlanc; Nick Bloom; Steven P Wolf; Sarah G Lowman; Kathryn I Pollak; Karen E Steinhauser; Dan Ariely; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Impact of the mental health and dynamic referral for oncology (MHADRO) program on oncology patient outcomes, health care utilization, and health provider behaviors: A multi-site randomized control trial.

Authors:  Erin O'Hea; Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers; Alexandra S Cutillo; Hannah R Michalak; Bruce A Barton; Tina Harralson; Cindy Carmack; Cori McMahon; Edwin D Boudreaux
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.