Wei Gao1, Michael I Bennett, Daniel Stark, Scott Murray, Irene J Higginson. 1. King's College London, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's Healthcare Partners, Weston Education Centre, 3rd Floor, Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RJ, United Kingdom.
Abstract
AIMS: Understanding how psychological distress changes over the cancer trajectory is essential to target interventions and care, but is little researched because of difficulties in conducting longitudinal studies. We aimed to determine the prevalence of psychological distress, its associated factors and clinical implications at three different stages in the cancer trajectory. DATA AND METHODS: Cancer patients from cancer outpatients (n=200), the general community (n=364) and specialist palliative care (n=150) were included. Psychological distress was assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Associated factors and clinical prognostic value were investigated using logistic regression and Cox regression. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of psychological distress was 24.5% (95% CI: 18.5-30.5%) in cancer outpatients during or soon after treatment, 16.5% (95%CI: 12.7-20.3%) in the general community and rose to 59.3% (95%CI: 51.4-67.2%) in specialist palliative care. Cancer type was the best predictor for psychological distress in both specialist palliative care (PR(prostate cancer versus other cancers)=5.61; 95%CI: 1.21-26.04; p=0.008) and general community samples (PR(lung cancer versus other cancers)=3.64; 95%CI: 1.08-12.35; p=0.003). Higher scores on GHQ-12 items predicted shorter survival in palliative care patients and showed weak protective or no association with survival in cancer outpatients. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing oncological treatment and then again as they approaching death have increased levels of psychological distress. Assessing psychological distress through survivorship and especially at these times may identify unmet psychological needs and allow targeted psychological support. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Understanding how psychological distress changes over the cancer trajectory is essential to target interventions and care, but is little researched because of difficulties in conducting longitudinal studies. We aimed to determine the prevalence of psychological distress, its associated factors and clinical implications at three different stages in the cancer trajectory. DATA AND METHODS: Cancerpatients from cancer outpatients (n=200), the general community (n=364) and specialist palliative care (n=150) were included. Psychological distress was assessed using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Associated factors and clinical prognostic value were investigated using logistic regression and Cox regression. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of psychological distress was 24.5% (95% CI: 18.5-30.5%) in cancer outpatients during or soon after treatment, 16.5% (95%CI: 12.7-20.3%) in the general community and rose to 59.3% (95%CI: 51.4-67.2%) in specialist palliative care. Cancer type was the best predictor for psychological distress in both specialist palliative care (PR(prostate cancer versus other cancers)=5.61; 95%CI: 1.21-26.04; p=0.008) and general community samples (PR(lung cancer versus other cancers)=3.64; 95%CI: 1.08-12.35; p=0.003). Higher scores on GHQ-12 items predicted shorter survival in palliative care patients and showed weak protective or no association with survival in cancer outpatients. CONCLUSION:Patients undergoing oncological treatment and then again as they approaching death have increased levels of psychological distress. Assessing psychological distress through survivorship and especially at these times may identify unmet psychological needs and allow targeted psychological support. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Hilde T H van der Kallen; Natasja J H Raijmakers; Judith A C Rietjens; Alex A van der Male; Herman J Bueving; Johannes J M van Delden; Agnes van der Heide Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Nicole L Stout; Catherine M Alfano; Christopher W Belter; Ralph Nitkin; Alison Cernich; Karen Lohmann Siegel; Leighton Chan Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Nora K Horick; Adoma Manful; Jan Lowery; Susan Domchek; Patricia Moorman; Constance Griffin; Kala Visvanathan; Claudine Isaacs; Anita Y Kinney; Dianne M Finkelstein Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Ellen Burke Beckjord; Kerry A Reynolds; G J van Londen; Rachel Burns; Reema Singh; Sarah R Arvey; Stephanie A Nutt; Ruth Rechis Journal: J Psychosoc Oncol Date: 2014
Authors: Thomas W LeBlanc; Nick Bloom; Steven P Wolf; Sarah G Lowman; Kathryn I Pollak; Karen E Steinhauser; Dan Ariely; James A Tulsky Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-11-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Erin O'Hea; Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers; Alexandra S Cutillo; Hannah R Michalak; Bruce A Barton; Tina Harralson; Cindy Carmack; Cori McMahon; Edwin D Boudreaux Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2019-11-05