BACKGROUND & AIMS: Upon exercise, primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is associated with significant acidosis in peripheral muscle with recovery rate from acidosis strongly associating with fatigue. PBC patients describe particular problems with repeat exercise describing subsequent exercise episodes being limited by perceived effects of the first. We modelled this effect by exploring kinetics of pH recovery during 3 linked exercise episodes using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). METHODS: Muscle acid handling capacity was studied following 3 x 3 min exercise periods at 35% maximum voluntary capacity in matched fatigued PBC, non-fatigued PBC and healthy controls (n=8 per group). RESULTS: Time to pH recovery following initial exercise was prolonged in PBC compared to controls (160 s [60-390] vs. 25 [0-180], p=0.005) with the longest recovery time seen in fatigued patients (median 210 s). All subjects shortened recovery time between exercise periods 1-2 (controls: mean -28%, non-fatigued PBC patients: -29% and fatigued PBC patients: -30%. Normals showed further recovery shortening between exercise periods 2-3 (-18%, p=ns vs. period 1-2 recovery) however this adaptive response was lost in non-fatigued PBC patients (+3%) and reversed in fatigued patients (+19%, p=0.01 vs. period 1-2). CONCLUSIONS: PBC patients retain the physiological capacity to shorten pH recovery time following repeat exercise. Capacity to shorten recovery time after a 2nd exercise period is lost in low-fatigue PBC patients and replaced by recovery prolongation in fatigued patients. Improvement in post-exercise acid recovery through exercise therapy should be possible in PBC patients and could be a novel approach to peripheral fatigue treatment. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Upon exercise, primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is associated with significant acidosis in peripheral muscle with recovery rate from acidosis strongly associating with fatigue. PBC patients describe particular problems with repeat exercise describing subsequent exercise episodes being limited by perceived effects of the first. We modelled this effect by exploring kinetics of pH recovery during 3 linked exercise episodes using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). METHODS: Muscle acid handling capacity was studied following 3 x 3 min exercise periods at 35% maximum voluntary capacity in matched fatigued PBC, non-fatigued PBC and healthy controls (n=8 per group). RESULTS: Time to pH recovery following initial exercise was prolonged in PBC compared to controls (160 s [60-390] vs. 25 [0-180], p=0.005) with the longest recovery time seen in fatigued patients (median 210 s). All subjects shortened recovery time between exercise periods 1-2 (controls: mean -28%, non-fatigued PBC patients: -29% and fatigued PBC patients: -30%. Normals showed further recovery shortening between exercise periods 2-3 (-18%, p=ns vs. period 1-2 recovery) however this adaptive response was lost in non-fatigued PBC patients (+3%) and reversed in fatigued patients (+19%, p=0.01 vs. period 1-2). CONCLUSIONS: PBC patients retain the physiological capacity to shorten pH recovery time following repeat exercise. Capacity to shorten recovery time after a 2nd exercise period is lost in low-fatigue PBC patients and replaced by recovery prolongation in fatigued patients. Improvement in post-exercise acid recovery through exercise therapy should be possible in PBC patients and could be a novel approach to peripheral fatigue treatment. Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Gideon M Hirschfield; Jessica K Dyson; Graeme J M Alexander; Michael H Chapman; Jane Collier; Stefan Hübscher; Imran Patanwala; Stephen P Pereira; Collette Thain; Douglas Thorburn; Dina Tiniakos; Martine Walmsley; George Webster; David E J Jones Journal: Gut Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Øystein Fluge; Olav Mella; Ove Bruland; Kristin Risa; Sissel E Dyrstad; Kine Alme; Ingrid G Rekeland; Dipak Sapkota; Gro V Røsland; Alexander Fosså; Irini Ktoridou-Valen; Sigrid Lunde; Kari Sørland; Katarina Lien; Ingrid Herder; Hanne Thürmer; Merete E Gotaas; Katarzyna A Baranowska; Louis Mlj Bohnen; Christoph Schäfer; Adrian McCann; Kristian Sommerfelt; Lars Helgeland; Per M Ueland; Olav Dahl; Karl J Tronstad Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-12-22
Authors: Jennifer Y Lee; Christopher J Danford; Hirsh D Trivedi; Elliot B Tapper; Vilas R Patwardhan; Alan Bonder Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Laura Jopson; Julia L Newton; Jeremy Palmer; Achilleas Floudas; John Isaacs; Jessica Qian; Jennifer Wilkinson; Mike Trenell; Andrew Blamire; Denise Howel; David E Jones Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Palak J Trivedi; Matthew J Armstrong; Alice Freer; Felicity Williams; Simon Durman; Jennifer Hayden Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Date: 2021-03
Authors: Greta Pells; George F Mells; Marco Carbone; Julia L Newton; Andrew J Bathgate; Andrew K Burroughs; Michael A Heneghan; James M Neuberger; Darren B Day; Samantha J Ducker; Richard N Sandford; Graeme J Alexander; David E J Jones Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 25.083