Literature DB >> 20447578

Evidence-based heart failure performance measures and clinical outcomes: a systematic review.

Jared Lane K Maeda1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based performance measures for heart failure are increasingly being used to stimulate quality improvement efforts. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Review, and a citation review. Research studies that assessed the association between the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) heart failure performance measures from the inpatient setting and patient outcomes were examined. Studies were restricted to those conducted within the United States from 2001 until the present and included at least 1 of the ACC/AHA performance measures for chronic heart failure and a clinical outcome as an endpoint. Eleven original studies and 1 literature review met the study inclusion criteria. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker and beta-blocker use at discharge had the strongest association with improved patient outcomes, whereas discharge instructions had a weaker but positive effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this systematic review suggest that an increase in compliance with the heart failure performance measures leads to a consistent positive impact on patient outcomes although the strength, magnitude, and significance of this effect is variable across the individual performance indicators. Further longitudinal studies and additional measure sets may yield deeper insights into the causal relationship between heart failure processes of care and clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20447578     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  10 in total

1.  Appraising hospital performance by using the JCHAO/CMS quality measures in Southern Italy.

Authors:  Domenico Flotta; Paolo Rizza; Pierluigi Coscarelli; Claudia Pileggi; Carmelo G A Nobile; Maria Pavia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Is the readmission rate a valid quality indicator? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Claudia Fischer; Hester F Lingsma; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Dionne S Kringos; Niek S Klazinga; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Chronic Heart Failure Clinical Practice Guidelines' Class 1-A Pharmacologic Recommendations: Start-to-End Synergistic Drug Therapy?

Authors:  Ramon F Abarquez; Paul Ferdinand M Reganit; Carmen N Chungunco; Jean Alcover; Felix Eduardo R Punzalan; Eugenio B Reyes; Elleen L Cunanan
Journal:  ASEAN Heart J       Date:  2016-03-08

Review 4.  What is the impact of systems of care for heart failure on patients diagnosed with heart failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea Driscoll; Sharon Meagher; Rhoda Kennedy; Melanie Hay; Jayant Banerji; Donald Campbell; Nicholas Cox; Debra Gascard; David Hare; Karen Page; Voltaire Nadurata; Rhonda Sanders; Harry Patsamanis
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  KSHF Guidelines for the Management of Acute Heart Failure: Part II. Treatment of Acute Heart Failure.

Authors:  Ju Hee Lee; Min Seok Kim; Byung Su Yoo; Sung Ji Park; Jin Joo Park; Mi Seung Shin; Jong Chan Youn; Sang Eun Lee; Se Yong Jang; Seonghoon Choi; Hyun Jai Cho; Seok Min Kang; Dong Ju Choi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.243

6.  Trends in quality of care among patients with incident heart failure in Denmark 2003-2010: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Nakano; Søren Paaske Johnsen; Birgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen; Marie Louise Svendsen; Carsten Agger; Inge Schjødt; Kenneth Egstrup
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Analysis Treatment Guideline versus Clinical Practice Protocol in Patients Hospitalized due to Heart Failure.

Authors:  Alessandra da Graça Corrêa; Marcia Makdisse; Marcelo Katz; Thamires Campos Santana; Paula Kiyomi Onaga Yokota; Tatiana de Fatima Gonçalves Galvão; Fernando Bacal
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 8.  Quality markers in cardiology: measures of outcomes and clinical practice--a perspective of the Spanish Society of Cardiology and of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Authors:  José-Luis López-Sendón; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Fausto Pinto; José Cuenca Castillo; Lina Badimón; Regina Dalmau; Esteban González Torrecilla; José Ramón López Mínguez; Alicia M Maceira; Domingo Pascual-Figal; José Luis Pomar Moya-Prats; Alessandro Sionis; José Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Predicted quality benefits of achievable performance benchmarks of chronic heart failure care in China: results from a nationwide observational study.

Authors:  Chang Yin; Xi Li; Chao Wang; Jingkun Li; Xiaoqiang Bao; Qiuju Zhang; Yupeng Wang; Xudong Ma; Meina Liu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Inequalities in heart failure care in a tax-financed universal healthcare system: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Inge Schjødt; Søren P Johnsen; Anna Strömberg; Jan B Valentin; Brian B Løgstrup
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-08-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.