Literature DB >> 20447543

Apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and the risk of vascular disease: systematic review of 40 studies involving 58,000 participants.

Sebhat Erqou1, Alexander Thompson, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Danish Saleheen, Stephen Kaptoge, Santica Marcovina, John Danesh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the association of apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]) isoforms with cardiovascular disease risk.
BACKGROUND: Although circulating lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is likely to be a causal risk factor in coronary heart disease (CHD), the magnitude of this association is modest. Lipoprotein(a) particles with smaller, rather than larger, apo(a) isoforms may be stronger risk factors.
METHODS: Information was collated from 40 studies published between January 1970 and June 2009 that reported on associations between apo(a) isoforms and risk of CHD or ischemic stroke (involving a total of 11,396 patients and 46,938 controls).
RESULTS: Thirty-six studies used broadly comparable phenotyping and analytic methods to assess apo(a) isoform size. These studies yielded a combined relative risk for CHD of 2.08 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.67 to 2.58) for individuals with smaller versus larger apo(a) isoforms (corresponding approximately to 22 or fewer kringle IV type 2 repeats vs. >22 repeats or analogously an apo[a] molecular weight of <640 kDa vs. > or =640 kDa). There was substantial heterogeneity among these studies (I(2) = 85%, 80% to 89%), which was mainly explained by differences in the laboratory methods and analytic approaches used. In the 6 studies of ischemic stroke that used comparable phenotypic methods, the combined relative risk was 2.14 (1.85 to 2.97). Overall, however, only 3 studies made allowances for Lp(a) concentration.
CONCLUSIONS: People with smaller apo(a) isoforms have an approximately 2-fold higher risk of CHD or ischemic stroke than those with larger proteins. Further studies are needed to determine whether the impact of smaller apo(a) isoforms is independent from Lp(a) concentration and other risk factors. Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20447543     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  93 in total

Review 1.  Lipoprotein apheresis for the treatment of elevated circulating levels of lipoprotein(a): a critical literature review.

Authors:  Massimo Franchini; Enrico Capuzzo; Giancarlo M Liumbruno
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Lipoprotein (a): Coming of Age at Last.

Authors:  Joseph L Witztum; Henry N Ginsberg
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 3.  Update on lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor and mediator.

Authors:  Michael B Boffa; Marlys L Koschinsky
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Lipid parameters for measuring risk of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Benoit J Arsenault; S Matthijs Boekholdt; John J P Kastelein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Causes and consequences of lipoprotein(a) abnormalities in kidney disease.

Authors:  Florian Kronenberg
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 6.  Screening for and management of elevated Lp(a).

Authors:  Michael B Boffa; Marlys L Koschinsky
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Lipid Biomarkers for Risk Assessment in Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Meeusen; Leslie J Donato; Allan S Jaffe
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Lipoprotein (a) level, apolipoprotein (a) size, and risk of unexplained ischemic stroke in young and middle-aged adults.

Authors:  Azadeh Beheshtian; Sanyog G Shitole; Alan Z Segal; Dana Leifer; Russell P Tracy; Daniel J Rader; Richard B Devereux; Jorge R Kizer
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 9.  Determinants of Achieved LDL Cholesterol and "Non-HDL" Cholesterol in the Management of Dyslipidemias.

Authors:  Chris J Packard
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Copy Number Variation and Risk of Stroke.

Authors:  Caspar Grond-Ginsbach; Philipp Erhart; Bowang Chen; Manja Kloss; Stefan T Engelter; John W Cole
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.