AIM: The purpose of this study is to investigate factors affecting terminally ill cancer patients dying at home. MATERIAL: Ninety-two terminally ill cancer patients who were receiving home medical care services and died between April 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. The data included patients' and caregivers' demographic characteristics, disease-related information, place of death, and status of home care support. To identify the factors predicting the place of death, multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Patients of families who had no preference regarding the place of death or a preference for death at home were more likely to die at home (vs preference for hospital death, odds ratio = 5.87, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-36.53; odds ratio = 90.35, 95% confidence interval = 8.15-1001.51, respectively) after adjusting for potential confounders. Meanwhile, if the patient's family preferred that the patient not die at home, the patient's place of death was not at his/her home irrespective of his/her preference. CONCLUSION: The results suggested the stronger involvement of families' preferences regarding the patients' place of death over patients' own preferences. Therefore, factors affecting families' preferences need to be clarified for the dissemination of death at home for terminally ill cancer patients.
AIM: The purpose of this study is to investigate factors affecting terminally ill cancerpatients dying at home. MATERIAL: Ninety-two terminally ill cancerpatients who were receiving home medical care services and died between April 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. The data included patients' and caregivers' demographic characteristics, disease-related information, place of death, and status of home care support. To identify the factors predicting the place of death, multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS:Patients of families who had no preference regarding the place of death or a preference for death at home were more likely to die at home (vs preference for hospital death, odds ratio = 5.87, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-36.53; odds ratio = 90.35, 95% confidence interval = 8.15-1001.51, respectively) after adjusting for potential confounders. Meanwhile, if the patient's family preferred that the patient not die at home, the patient's place of death was not at his/her home irrespective of his/her preference. CONCLUSION: The results suggested the stronger involvement of families' preferences regarding the patients' place of death over patients' own preferences. Therefore, factors affecting families' preferences need to be clarified for the dissemination of death at home for terminally ill cancerpatients.
Authors: Peter Tanuseputro; Sarah Beach; Mathieu Chalifoux; Walter P Wodchis; Amy T Hsu; Hsien Seow; Douglas G Manuel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 3.240