Literature DB >> 20446839

A description of shock attenuation for children running.

John A Mercer1, Janet S Dufek, Brent C Mangus, Mack D Rubley, Kunal Bhanot, Jennifer M Aldridge.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: A growing number of children are participating in organized sport activities, resulting in a concomitant increase in lower extremity injuries. Little is known about the impact generated when children are running or how this impact is attenuated in child runners.
OBJECTIVE: To describe shock attenuation characteristics for children running at different speeds on a treadmill and at a single speed over ground.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eleven boys (age = 10.5 +/- 0.9 years, height = 143.7 +/- 8.3 cm, mass = 39.4 +/- 10.9 kg) and 7 girls (age = 9.9 +/- 1.1 years, height = 136.2 +/- 7.7 cm, mass = 35.1 +/- 9.6 kg) participated. INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed 4 running conditions, including 3 treadmill (TM) running speeds (preferred, fast [0.5 m/s more than preferred], and slow [0.5 m/s less than preferred]) and 1 overground (OG) running speed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We measured leg peak impact acceleration (LgPk), head peak impact acceleration (HdPk), and shock attenuation (ratio of LgPk to HdPk).
RESULTS: Shock attenuation (F(2,16) = 4.80, P = .01) was influenced by the interaction of speed and sex. Shock attenuation increased across speeds (slow, preferred, fast) for boys (P < .05) but not for girls (P > .05). Both LgPk (F(1,16) = 5.04, P = .04) and HdPk (F(1,16) = 6.04, P = .03) were different across speeds, and both were greater for girls than for boys. None of the dependent variables were influenced by the interaction of setting (TM, OG) and sex (P >or= .05). Shock attenuation (F(1,16) = 33.51, P < .001) and LgPk (F(1,16) = 31.54, P < .001) were different between TM and OG, and each was greater when running OG than on the TM, regardless of sex.
CONCLUSIONS: Shock attenuation was between 66% and 76% for children running under a variety of conditions. Girls had greater peak impact accelerations at the leg and head levels than boys but achieved similar shock attenuation. We do not know how these shock attenuation characteristics are related to overuse injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20446839      PMCID: PMC2865964          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.3.259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  22 in total

Review 1.  The young athlete.

Authors:  J S Marsh; J P Daigneault
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.856

2.  Is lower limb muscle synchrony during landing affected by gender? Implications for variations in ACL injury rates.

Authors:  E J Cowling; J R Steele
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 3.  Prevention of sports injuries in children.

Authors:  John M Flynn; Julia E Lou; Theodore J Ganley
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.856

4.  Valgus knee motion during landing in high school female and male basketball players.

Authors:  Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Individual effects of stride length and frequency on shock attenuation during running.

Authors:  John A Mercer; Paul Devita; Tim R Derrick; Barry T Bates
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Relationship between shock attenuation and stride length during running at different velocities.

Authors:  John A Mercer; Jason Vance; Alan Hreljac; Joseph Hamill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runners.

Authors:  A Hreljac; R N Marshall; P A Hume
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Overuse injuries in youth sports: biomechanical considerations.

Authors:  D Hawkins; J Metheny
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Characteristics of shock attenuation during fatigued running.

Authors:  J A Mercer; B T Bates; J S Dufek; A Hreljac
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  Injuries in youth amateur soccer and rugby players--comparison of incidence and characteristics.

Authors:  A Junge; K Cheung; T Edwards; J Dvorak
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 13.800

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quick benefits of interval training versus continuous training on bone: a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparative study.

Authors:  Arnaud Boudenot; Delphine B Maurel; Stéphane Pallu; Isabelle Ingrand; Nathalie Boisseau; Christelle Jaffré; Hugues Portier
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Foot Strike Patterns Differ Between Children and Adolescents Growing up Barefoot vs. Shod.

Authors:  Karsten Hollander; Johanna Elsabe de Villiers; Ranel Venter; Susanne Sehner; Karl Wegscheider; Klaus-Michael Braumann; Astrid Zech
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Comparison of impact accelerations between injury-resistant and recently injured recreational runners.

Authors:  Aoife Burke; Sarah Dillon; Siobhán O'Connor; Enda F Whyte; Shane Gore; Kieran A Moran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Relationship between Lower Limb Kinematics and Upper Trunk Acceleration in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Laura Simoni; Silvia Pancani; Federica Vannetti; Claudio Macchi; Guido Pasquini
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 5.  Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren C Benson; Anu M Räisänen; Christian A Clermont; Reed Ferber
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Shock attenuation, spatio-temporal and physiological parameter comparisons between land treadmill and water treadmill running.

Authors:  Paul W Macdermid; Philip W Fink; Stephen R Stannard
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 7.179

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.