Literature DB >> 20445999

Risk factors for deep surgical site infections after spinal fusion.

J J P Schimmel1, P P Horsting, M de Kleuver, G Wonders, J van Limbeek.   

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSI) are undesired and troublesome complications after spinal surgery. The reported infection rates range from 0.7 to 11.9%, depending on the diagnosis and the complexity of the procedure. Besides operative factors, patient characteristics could also account for increased infection rates. Because the medical, economic and social costs of SSI are enormous, any significant reduction in risks will pay dividends. The purpose of this study is to compare patients who developed deep SSI following lumbar or thoracolumbar spinal fusion with a randomly selected group of patients who did not develop this complication in order to identify changeable risk factors. With a case-control analysis nested in a historical cohort of patients who had had a spinal fusion between January 1999 and December 2008, we identified 36 cases with deep SSI (CDC criteria). Information regarding patient-level and surgical-level risk factors was derived from standardized but routinely recorded data and compared with those acquired in a random selection of 135 uninfected patients. Univariate analyses and a multivariate logistic regression were performed. The overall rate of infection in 1,615 procedures (1,568 patients) was 2.2%. A positive history of spinal surgery was associated with an almost four times higher infection rate (OR = 3.7, 95% BI = 1.6-8.6). The risk of SSI increased with the number of levels fused, patients with diabetes had an almost six times higher risk and smokers had more than a two times higher risk for deep SSI. The most common organism cultured was Staphylococcus aureus. All infected patients underwent at least one reoperation, including an open débridement and received appropriate antibiotics to treat the organism. Patients who had had a previous spinal surgery are a high-risk group for infection compared with those that never had surgery. Total costs associated with preventive measures are substantial and should be compensated by health care insurance companies by means of separate clinical pathways. High-risk patients should be informed about the increased risk of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20445999      PMCID: PMC2989231          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1421-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  20 in total

1.  Single-dose vs multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in instrumented lumbar fusion--a prospective study.

Authors:  Leslie C Hellbusch; Michele Helzer-Julin; Stephen E Doran; Lyal G Leibrock; Douglas J Long; Mark J Puccioni; William E Thorell; John S Treves
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2008-01-18

2.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the use of prophylactic antibiotics in spine surgery.

Authors:  William C Watters; Jamie Baisden; Christopher M Bono; Michael H Heggeness; Daniel K Resnick; William O Shaffer; John F Toton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 3.  Cost analysis of surgical site infections.

Authors:  Joshua A Urban
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.150

4.  Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Fang; Serena S Hu; Nathan Endres; David S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Random effect modelling of patient-related risk factors in orthopaedic procedures: results from the Dutch nosocomial infection surveillance network 'PREZIES'.

Authors:  J Muilwijk; G H I M Walenkamp; A Voss; J C Wille; S van den Hof
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  Postoperative spinal wound infections.

Authors:  Rick C Sasso; Ben J Garrido
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Postoperative posterior spinal wound infections.

Authors:  J B Massie; J G Heller; J J Abitbol; D McPherson; S R Garfin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Clinical outcome of deep wound infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  James M Mok; Tenner J Guillaume; Ufuk Talu; Sigurd H Berven; Vedat Deviren; Markus Kroeber; David S Bradford; Serena S Hu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Jennie Mayfield; Carl Lauryssen; Louis B Polish; Marilyn Jones; Joshua Vest; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 10.  Mupirocin ointment for preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections in nasal carriers.

Authors:  Miranda van Rijen; Marc Bonten; Richard Wenzel; Jan Kluytmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08
View more
  83 in total

1.  Prophylactic intraoperative powdered vancomycin and postoperative deep spinal wound infection: 1,512 consecutive surgical cases over a 6-year period.

Authors:  Robert W Molinari; Oner A Khera; William J Molinari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Body mass index and risk of surgical site infection following spine surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dima Y Abdallah; Mutaz M Jadaan; John P McCabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Individualized antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections by gram-negative bacteria in instrumented spinal surgery.

Authors:  Susana Núñez-Pereira; F Pellisé; D Rodríguez-Pardo; C Pigrau; J M Sánchez; J Bagó; C Villanueva; E Cáceres
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Risk factors for surgical site infection following pediatric spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Meng; Junming Cao; Xianzhong Meng
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery.

Authors:  Dan Xing; Jian-Xiong Ma; Xin-Long Ma; Dong-Hui Song; Jie Wang; Yang Chen; Yang Yang; Shao-Wen Zhu; Bao-Yi Ma; Rui Feng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The use of antibiotic-impregnated fibrin sealant for the prevention of surgical site infection associated with spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Tofuku; Hiroaki Koga; Mitsuhiro Yanase; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  The challenge of infection prevention in spine surgery: an update.

Authors:  T Ferry; F Valour; S Lustig; F Laurent; G Perrin; C Chidiac; C Barrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-05-21

Review 8.  [Infections after reconstructive spinal interventions : How do I deal with them?]

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Michael Akbar; Nicholas A Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Predisposing factors for surgical site infection of spinal instrumentation surgery for diabetes patients.

Authors:  Kotaro Satake; Tokumi Kanemura; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Hidetoshi Yamaguchi; Yoshimoto Ishikawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Analysis of Postoperative Thoracolumbar Spine Infections in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Centers for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection Criteria.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Richelle C Takemoto; Baron S Lonner; Tate M Andres; Justin J Park; Pedro A Ricart-Hoffiz; John A Bendo; Jeffrey A Goldstein; Jeffrey M Spivak; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.