Wu Deng1, Lia Baki, Clive M Baumgarten. 1. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0551, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: We assessed regulation of volume-sensitive Cl(-) current (I(Cl,swell)) by endothelin-1 (ET-1) and characterized the signalling pathway responsible for its activation in rabbit atrial and ventricular myocytes. METHODS AND RESULTS: ET-1 elicited I(Cl,swell) under isosmotic conditions. Outwardly rectified Cl(-) current was blocked by the I(Cl,swell)-selective inhibitor DCPIB or osmotic shrinkage and involved ET(A) but not ET(B) receptors. ET-1-induced current was abolished by inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase or phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI-3K), indicating that these kinases were downstream. Regarding upstream events, activation of I(Cl,swell) by osmotic swelling or angiotensin II (AngII) was suppressed by ET(A) blockade, whereas AngII AT(1) receptor blockade failed to alter ET-1-induced current. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NADPH oxidase (NOX) stimulate I(Cl,swell). As expected, blockade of NOX suppressed ET-1-induced I(Cl,swell), but blockade of mitochondrial ROS production with rotenone also suppressed I(Cl,swell). I(Cl,swell) was activated by augmenting complex III ROS production with antimycin A or diazoxide; in this case, I(Cl,swell) was insensitive to NOX inhibitors, indicating that mitochondria were downstream from NOX. ROS generation in HL-1 cardiomyocytes measured by flow cytometry confirmed the electrophysiological findings. ET-1-induced ROS production was inhibited by blocking either NOX or mitochondrial complex I, whereas complex III-induced ROS production was insensitive to NOX blockade. CONCLUSION: ET-1-ET(A) signalling activated I(Cl,swell) via EGFR kinase, PI-3K, and NOX ROS production, which triggered mitochondrial ROS production. ET(A) receptors were downstream effectors when I(Cl,swell) was elicited by osmotic swelling or AngII. These data suggest that ET-1-induced ROS-dependent I(Cl,swell) is likely to participate in multiple physiological and pathophysiological processes.
AIMS: We assessed regulation of volume-sensitive Cl(-) current (I(Cl,swell)) by endothelin-1 (ET-1) and characterized the signalling pathway responsible for its activation in rabbit atrial and ventricular myocytes. METHODS AND RESULTS:ET-1 elicited I(Cl,swell) under isosmotic conditions. Outwardly rectified Cl(-) current was blocked by the I(Cl,swell)-selective inhibitor DCPIB or osmotic shrinkage and involved ET(A) but not ET(B) receptors. ET-1-induced current was abolished by inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase or phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI-3K), indicating that these kinases were downstream. Regarding upstream events, activation of I(Cl,swell) by osmotic swelling or angiotensin II (AngII) was suppressed by ET(A) blockade, whereas AngII AT(1) receptor blockade failed to alter ET-1-induced current. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NADPH oxidase (NOX) stimulate I(Cl,swell). As expected, blockade of NOX suppressed ET-1-induced I(Cl,swell), but blockade of mitochondrial ROS production with rotenone also suppressed I(Cl,swell). I(Cl,swell) was activated by augmenting complex III ROS production with antimycin A or diazoxide; in this case, I(Cl,swell) was insensitive to NOX inhibitors, indicating that mitochondria were downstream from NOX. ROS generation in HL-1 cardiomyocytes measured by flow cytometry confirmed the electrophysiological findings. ET-1-induced ROS production was inhibited by blocking either NOX or mitochondrial complex I, whereas complex III-induced ROS production was insensitive to NOX blockade. CONCLUSION:ET-1-ET(A) signalling activated I(Cl,swell) via EGFR kinase, PI-3K, and NOX ROS production, which triggered mitochondrial ROS production. ET(A) receptors were downstream effectors when I(Cl,swell) was elicited by osmotic swelling or AngII. These data suggest that ET-1-induced ROS-dependent I(Cl,swell) is likely to participate in multiple physiological and pathophysiological processes.
Authors: M Araki; K Hasegawa; E Iwai-Kanai; M Fujita; T Sawamura; T Kakita; H Wada; T Morimoto; S Sasayama Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Keith D Garlid; Alexandre D T Costa; Casey L Quinlan; Sandrine V Pierre; Pierre Dos Santos Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2008-12-11 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Carsten Sand; Stephan L M Peters; Martin Pfaffendorf; Pieter A van Zwieten Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2003-05-06 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Jonathan A Byrne; David J Grieve; Jennifer K Bendall; Jian-Mei Li; Christopher Gove; J David Lambeth; Alison C Cave; Ajay M Shah Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-10-09 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Kerstin Ebefors; Robert J Wiener; Liping Yu; Evren U Azeloglu; Zhengzi Yi; Fu Jia; Weijia Zhang; Margaret H Baron; John C He; Börje Haraldsson; Ilse Daehn Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 10.612