Literature DB >> 20444950

In vitro starch digestion kinetics, corrected for estimated gastric emptying, predict portal glucose appearance in pigs.

Theo A T G van Kempen1, Prajwal R Regmi, J Jacques Matte, Ruurd T Zijlstra.   

Abstract

In vitro starch digestion is used for predicting the in vivo glucose response, but their relationship has not been defined thoroughly. To clarify, in vitro starch digestion using a modified Englyst-assay was compared to portal glucose appearance in pigs. Four portal vein-catheterized pigs (43.2 +/- 4.8 kg body weight) were fed 4 diets containing 70% purified starch ranging from slowly to rapidly digestible [maximal rate of in vitro digestion (%)/min: 0.22 (slowly), 0.38, 0.73, and 1.06 (rapidly)] for 7-d periods in a 4 x 4 Latin square. In vivo (R2 = 0.964) and in vitro (R2 = 0.998) data were modeled using a Chapman-Richards model that accurately described the sigmoidal glucose-release profiles. Across samples, the extent of glucose recovered was less in vivo than in vitro (69 vs. 42% of starch). The rate of glucose release adjusted for plateau effects was lower in vivo (0.35 vs. 0.89%/min), whereas the shape parameter adjusted for plateau effects (sigmoidal modifier) was higher in vivo (37.9 vs. 13.7). Consequently, peak glucose release in vivo occurred 69 min postprandial, whereas it occurred only 6 min into the second stage of digestion in vitro. Cumulative portal glucose appearance was strongly related (R2 = 0.89; P < 0.001) to in vitro glucose release, although a nonlinear bias was observed. After correcting in vitro release with predicted gastric emptying, the relationship improved and became linear (R2 = 0.95; P < 0.001). In conclusion, in vitro starch digestion kinetics predict portal glucose appearance up to 8 h postprandial accurately provided that in vitro data are corrected for gastric emptying.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20444950     DOI: 10.3945/jn.109.120584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of gastric processing and duodenal digestion of starch in six cereal meals on the associated glycaemic response using an adult fasted dynamic gastric model.

Authors:  Simon Ballance; Stefan Sahlstrøm; Per Lea; Nina E Nagy; Petter V Andersen; Tzvetelin Dessev; Sarah Hull; Maria Vardakou; Richard Faulks
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Pigs Ferment Enzymatically Digestible Starch when it Is Substituted for Resistant Starch.

Authors:  Rik J J van Erp; Sonja de Vries; Theo A T G van Kempen; Walter J J Gerrits
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Effects of using cassava as an amylopectin source in low protein diets on growth performance, nitrogen efficiency, and postprandial changes in plasma glucose and related hormones concentrations of growing pigs.

Authors:  Junyan Zhou; Lu Wang; Jianchuan Zhou; Xiangfang Zeng; Shiyan Qiao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Different dietary starch patterns in low-protein diets: effect on nitrogen efficiency, nutrient metabolism, and intestinal flora in growing pigs.

Authors:  Junyan Zhou; Lu Wang; Lijie Yang; Guangxin Yang; Xiangfang Zeng; Shiyan Qiao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 5.  Measures Matter-Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine.

Authors:  Gerald C Shurson; Yuan-Tai Hung; Jae Cheol Jang; Pedro E Urriola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Enzymatically Modified Starch Favorably Modulated Intestinal Transit Time and Hindgut Fermentation in Growing Pigs.

Authors:  M A Newman; Q Zebeli; K Velde; D Grüll; T Molnar; W Kandler; B U Metzler-Zebeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Efficacy of different fibres and flour mixes in South-Asian flatbreads for reducing post-prandial glucose responses in healthy adults.

Authors:  Hanny M Boers; Katrina MacAulay; Peter Murray; Jack Seijen Ten Hoorn; Anne-Roos Hoogenraad; Harry P F Peters; Maria A M Vente-Spreeuwenberg; David J Mela
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.614

8.  Amylopectin structure and crystallinity explains variation in digestion kinetics of starches across botanic sources in an in vitro pig model.

Authors:  Bianca M J Martens; Walter J J Gerrits; Erik M A M Bruininx; Henk A Schols
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-12-29

9.  Effects of Dietary Amylose-Amylopectin Ratio on Growth Performance and Intestinal Digestive and Absorptive Function in Weaned Piglet Response to Lipopolysaccharide.

Authors:  Min Wang; Can Yang; Qiye Wang; Jianzhong Li; Yali Li; Xueqin Ding; Pengfei Huang; Huansheng Yang; Yulong Yin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.231

10.  Phytochemical Composition and Cytotoxic Effects on Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells of Different Berries Following a Simulated In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion.

Authors:  Francesca Giampieri; Sadia Afrin; Derek Stewart; Gordon J McDougall; Rex Brennan; Lesley Blyth; Massimiliano Gasparrini; Luca Mazzoni; Franco Capocasa; Josè Miguel Alvarez-Suarez; Stefano Bompadre; Pedro Nogueira Brás de Oliveira; Claudia N Santos; Manuel Masias; Pablo Agudo; Jorge Crespo; Bruno Mezzetti; Tamara Y Forbes-Hernández; Maurizio Battino
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.