Literature DB >> 20444778

A comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching in nursing ethics education.

Chiou-Fen Lin1, Meei-Shiow Lu, Chun-Chih Chung, Che-Ming Yang.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the learning effectiveness of peer tutored problem-based learning and conventional teaching of nursing ethics in Taiwan. The study adopted an experimental design. The peer tutored problem-based learning method was applied to an experimental group and the conventional teaching method to a control group. The study sample consisted of 142 senior nursing students who were randomly assigned to the two groups. All the students were tested for their nursing ethical discrimination ability both before and after the educational intervention. A learning satisfaction survey was also administered to both groups at the end of each course. After the intervention, both groups showed a significant increase in ethical discrimination ability. There was a statistically significant difference between the ethical discrimination scores of the two groups (P < 0.05), with the experimental group on average scoring higher than the control group. There were significant differences in satisfaction with self-motivated learning and critical thinking between the groups. Peer tutored problem-based learning and lecture-type conventional teaching were both effective for nursing ethics education, but problem-based learning was shown to be more effective. Peer tutored problem-based learning has the potential to enhance the efficacy of teaching nursing ethics in situations in which there are personnel and resource constraints.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20444778     DOI: 10.1177/0969733009355380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  15 in total

1.  Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.

Authors:  Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 2.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.

Authors:  E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Implementation and evaluation of a near-peer-facilitated medical ethics curriculum for first-year medical students: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mikalyn T DeFoor; Lauren East; Paul C Mann; Carol A Nichols
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-12-06

5.  Are Emergency Medicine Residents Prepared to Meet the Ethical Challenges of Clinical Practice? Findings from an Exploratory National Survey.

Authors:  Aasim I Padela; Joshua Davis; Stephen Hall; Alyrene Dorey; Shellie Asher
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2018-10-07

6.  The value of peer learning in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robyn Stone; Simon Cooper; Robyn Cant
Journal:  ISRN Nurs       Date:  2013-04-03

Review 7.  A narrative review of undergraduate peer-based healthcare ethics teaching.

Authors:  Thomas Hindmarch; Silvia Allikmets; Felicity Knights
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2015-12-12

Review 8.  Effective in-service training design and delivery: evidence from an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Julia Bluestone; Peter Johnson; Judith Fullerton; Catherine Carr; Jessica Alderman; James BonTempo
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2013-10-01

9.  Comparison of Problem-based Learning With Lecture-based Learning.

Authors:  Parisa Khoshnevisasl; Mansour Sadeghzadeh; Saeidah Mazloomzadeh; Reza Hashemi Feshareki; Akefeh Ahmadiafshar
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 0.611

Review 10.  Insights into medical humanities education in China and the West.

Authors:  Yun Qian; Qixin Han; Weien Yuan; Cunyi Fan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.