Literature DB >> 2044432

Genetic and environmental determinants of hypopus duration in the stored-product mite Lepidoglyphus destructor.

W Knülle1.   

Abstract

This paper reports a series of experiments over many years on hypopus duration and extends the preceding investigation (1987) on hypopus formation in Lepidoglyphus destructor (Schrank, 1781). The length of time required for hypopus physiogenesis (diapause development) is genetically programmed but influenced by environmental factors. This span of time is highly variable, and may extend from one week to more than a year. Spreading out the potential for hypopus completion over time is adaptive, since a pool of hypopodes with prolonged and staggered dormancies serves to spread the risk of emergence of tritonymphs over extended periods of time; it buffers the population against sudden drought to which all other stages of the life-cycle succumb. The additive structure and large variance of the genetic system underlying the length of time required for hypopus physiogenesis allows for the reconstitution of a broad spectrum of genotypes in every generation through the process of meiotic segregation and recombination during sexual reproduction. It favours stored variability, provides a 'fail-safe device' both for survival as well as development in irregularly fluctuating environments, and facilitates the adaptation of populations to local conditions. The trait for hypopus physiogenesis varies independently from that of hypopus formation, and is apparently free to adjust, without genetic constraints, towards an adaptive optimum. The response to selection is fast. Low environmental humidities and high temperatures accelerate physiogenesis of the hypopus. Completion of the hypopus stage and moulting to the tritonymph is triggered by high humidities at moderate temperatures. If environmental conditions preclude moulting, the hypopus following ending of physiogenesis enters a state of quiescence. In contrast the seasonal and largely predictably varying environments, in which essentially anticipatory and season-related token cues like photoperiod regulate the timing of so many arthropod life-cycles, L. destructor copes with sudden and fatal drought, as well as with unheralded and favourable humidities in its ephemeral habitats, mainly by excessive genetic polymorphism in hypopus duration and formation; some genotypes are always instantaneously fit to meet the respective environmental situation. The mite faces gradual food deterioration of its patchily distributed microhabitats by a short-term anticipatory and environmentally cued developmental switch mechanism, which lowers the threshold for hypopus induction. On top of genetic variability and phenotypic plasticity, any genotype X environment interaction provides for increasing flexibility above that from genetic polymorphism and environmental polyphenism alone. This extraordinary measure of adaptedness fits L. destructor for life in irregularly fluctuating environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2044432     DOI: 10.1007/bf01198653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  8 in total

1.  ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF MYCOPHAGY IN STORED-PRODUCT ARTHROPODA.

Authors:  R N Sinha
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Demonstration of allergen components in the storage mite Lepidoglyphus destructor by an immunoblotting technique.

Authors:  E Johansson; M van Hage-Hamsten; S G Johansson
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol       Date:  1988

3.  Storage mites in hay in Iceland.

Authors:  T E Hallas; B Gudmundsson
Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis Suppl       Date:  1987

4.  Genetic variability and ecological adaptability of hypopus formation in a stored product mite.

Authors:  W Knülle
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Allergy to storage mites or cow dander as a cause of rhinitis among Finnish dairy farmers.

Authors:  E O Terho; K Husman; I Vohlonen; M Rautalahti; H Tukiainen
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 13.146

6.  Storage mites as a cause of bronchial asthma in Denmark.

Authors:  J Korsgaard; R Dahl; M Iversen; T Hallas
Journal:  Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.667

7.  Storage mite allergy among grain elevator workers.

Authors:  P Revsbech; G Andersen
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 13.146

8.  Storage mite allergy is common in a farming population.

Authors:  M van Hage-Hamsten; S G Johansson; S Höglund; P Tüll; A Wirén; O Zetterstrom
Journal:  Clin Allergy       Date:  1985-11
  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Alternative phenotypes and sexual selection: can dichotomous handicaps honestly signal quality?

Authors:  Juliusz Unrug; Joseph L Tomkins; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The biology of allergenic domestic mites. An update.

Authors:  B J Hart
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  The influence of temperature and relative humidity on the development of Lepidoglyphus destructor (Acari: Glycyphagidae) and its production of allergens: a laboratory experiment.

Authors:  Charlotte Danielsen; Lise Stengård Hansen; Gösta Nachman; Christian Herling
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Trophic determinants of hypopus induction in the stored-product mite Lepidoglyphus destructor (Acari: Astigmata).

Authors:  Ch Corente; W Knülle
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.132

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.