Literature DB >> 20443991

Multiple benefits of cooperative breeding in purple-crowned fairy-wrens: a consequence of fidelity?

Sjouke A Kingma1, Michelle L Hall, Elena Arriero, Anne Peters.   

Abstract

1. Kin selection is one of the mechanisms that can explain apparent altruism by subordinate individuals in cooperatively breeding species, if subordinates boost the production of kin. We compared productivity and breeder survival in pairs with and without subordinates in a genetically monogamous cooperatively breeding bird, the purple-crowned fairy-wren Malurus coronatus. 2. Additive effects of subordinate help increased productivity. Total feeding rates to the nest were increased by two or more subordinates, and fledgling production was greater in larger groups. Not all subordinates contributed to nestling feeding, and the effect of group size was greater when non-contributors were excluded from analyses, suggesting that increased fledgling production was a direct result of help. 3. Compensatory effects of subordinate help improved breeder survival. Assisted breeders reduced their workload by 20-30%, irrespective of the number of helpers. Although re-nesting intervals were not affected by group size, reduced breeder feeding rates resulted in improved survival and breeders in larger groups survived better. 4. Subordinates and nestlings are usually progeny of the breeding pair in this species, and benefits of cooperative breeding are very different from three congeners with extremely high levels of extra-group paternity (EGP). In these Malurus, fledgling production and survival of male breeders are not enhanced in larger groups. This is consistent with the expectation that kin-selected benefits vary with relatedness, and thus levels of EGP. 5. We tested whether benefits of cooperative breeding in 37 avian species varied with levels of extra-group mating. Both direct and phylogenetically controlled comparisons showed that improvement of (male) breeder survival and enhanced productivity are more likely when fidelity is higher, as predicted when investment of subordinates correlates with relatedness to offspring. This pattern highlights the importance of considering the genetic mating system for understanding the evolution of cooperative breeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443991     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01697.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  17 in total

1.  When should cuckolded males care for extra-pair offspring?

Authors:  Jannis Liedtke; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Kinship reduces alloparental care in cooperative cichlids where helpers pay-to-stay.

Authors:  Markus Zöttl; Dik Heg; Noémie Chervet; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Contrasting associations between nestling telomere length and pre and postnatal helpers' presence in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Martin Quque; Matthieu Paquet; Sandrine Zahn; Frank Théron; Bruno Faivre; Cédric Sueur; François Criscuolo; Claire Doutrelant; Rita Covas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Hot and dry conditions predict shorter nestling telomeres in an endangered songbird: Implications for population persistence.

Authors:  Justin R Eastwood; Tim Connallon; Kaspar Delhey; Michelle L Hall; Niki Teunissen; Sjouke A Kingma; Ariana M La Porte; Simon Verhulst; Anne Peters
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Fitness outcomes in relation to individual variation in constitutive innate immune function.

Authors:  Michael J Roast; Nataly Hidalgo Aranzamendi; Marie Fan; Niki Teunissen; Matthew D Hall; Anne Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Habitat fragmentation shapes natal dispersal and sociality in an Afrotropical cooperative breeder.

Authors:  Laurence Cousseau; Martijn Hammers; Dries Van de Loock; Beate Apfelbeck; Mwangi Githiru; Erik Matthysen; Luc Lens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Hard-working helpers contribute to long breeder lifespans in cooperative birds.

Authors:  Philip A Downing; Ashleigh S Griffin; Charlie K Cornwallis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Male songbird indicates body size with low-pitched advertising songs.

Authors:  Michelle L Hall; Sjouke A Kingma; Anne Peters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9. 

Authors:  Peter Santema; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Variability, heritability and condition-dependence of the multidimensional male colour phenotype in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Marie Fan; Michelle L Hall; Michael Roast; Anne Peters; Kaspar Delhey
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.