Literature DB >> 20443806

Complication and failure rates in patients treated for chronic periodontitis and restored with single crowns on teeth and/or implants.

Kurt Schmidlin1, Natascha Schnell, Stefanie Steiner, Giovanni E Salvi, Bjarni Pjetursson, Giedre Matuliene, Marcel Zwahlen, Urs Brägger, Niklaus P Lang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the biological and technical complication rates of single crowns on vital teeth (SC-V), endodontically treated teeth without post and core (SC-E), with a cast post and core (SC-PC) and on implants (SC-I).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 392 patients with chronic periodontitis treated and documented by graduate students during the period from 1978 to 2002, 199 were reexamined during 2005 for this retrospective cohort study, and 64 of these patients were treated with SCs. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival functions and event rates per 100 years of object-time. Poisson regression was used to compare the four groups of crowns with respect to the incidence rate ratio of failures, and failures and complications combined over 10 years and the entire observation period.
RESULTS: Forty-one (64%) female and 23 (36%) male patients participated in the reexamination. At the time of seating the crowns, the mean patient age was 46.8 (range 24-66.3) years. One hundred and sixty-eight single unit crowns were incorporated. Their mean follow-up time was 11.8 (range 0.8-26.4) years. During the time of observation, 22 biological and 11 technical complications occurred; 19 SC were lost. The chance for SC-V (56) to remain free of any failure or complication was 89.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.1-95.4) after 10 years, 85.8% (95% CI 66-94.5) for SC-E (34), 75.9% for SC-PC (39), (95% CI 58.8-86.7) and 66.2% (95% CI 45.1-80.7) for SC-I (39). Over 10 years, 95% of SC-I remained free of failure and demonstrated a cumulative incidence of failure or complication of 34%. Compared with SC-E, SC-I were 3.5 times more likely to yield failures or complications and SC-PC failed 1.7 times more frequently than did SC-E. SC-V had the lowest rate of failures or complications over the 10 years.
CONCLUSIONS: While SCs on vital teeth have the best prognosis, those on endodontically treated teeth have a slightly poorer prognosis over 10 years. Crowns on teeth with post and cores and implant-supported SCs displayed the highest incidence of failures and complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443806     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01907.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Clinical performance of different types of dental prosthesis in patients with head and neck tumors-a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Karina Zierden; Juliane Wöstmann; Bernd Wöstmann; Peter Rehmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 2.  How frequent does peri-implantitis occur? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mia Rakic; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Alberto Monje; Sandro Radovanovic; Hom-Lay Wang; David Cochran; Anton Sculean; Luigi Canullo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Chemical inhibition of prometastatic lysyl-tRNA synthetase-laminin receptor interaction.

Authors:  Dae Gyu Kim; Jin Young Lee; Nam Hoon Kwon; Pengfei Fang; Qian Zhang; Jing Wang; Nicolas L Young; Min Guo; Hye Young Cho; Ameeq Ul Mushtaq; Young Ho Jeon; Jin Woo Choi; Jung Min Han; Ho Woong Kang; Jae Eun Joo; Youn Hur; Wonyoung Kang; Heekyoung Yang; Do-Hyun Nam; Mi-Sook Lee; Jung Weon Lee; Eun-Sook Kim; Aree Moon; Kibom Kim; Doyeun Kim; Eun Joo Kang; Youngji Moon; Kyung Hee Rhee; Byung Woo Han; Jee Sun Yang; Gyoonhee Han; Won Suk Yang; Cheolju Lee; Ming-Wei Wang; Sunghoon Kim
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 15.040

4.  Early radiographic diagnosis of peri-implantitis enhances the outcome of peri-implantitis treatment: a 5-year retrospective study after non-surgical treatment.

Authors:  Hee-Yung Chang; Shin-Young Park; Jin-Ah Kim; Young-Kyun Kim; Hyo-Jung Lee
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Retrospective clinical study of tooth-supported single crowns: A multifactor analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Hawthan; Bruno R Chrcanovic; Christel Larsson
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 6.  A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations.

Authors:  Devangkumar Rajnikant Patel; Tim O'Brien; Aviva Petrie; Haralampos Petridis
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Periodontal regeneration versus extraction and dental implant or prosthetic replacement of teeth severely compromised by attachment loss to the apex: A randomized controlled clinical trial reporting 10-year outcomes, survival analysis and mean cumulative cost of recurrence.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Cortellini; Gabrielle Stalpers; Aniello Mollo; Maurizio S Tonetti
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 8.728

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.