Literature DB >> 20443796

Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations.

Juan Carlos de Vicente1, Gonzalo Hernández-Vallejo, Pelayo Braña-Abascal, Ignacio Peña.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical efficacy of a mixture of autologous bone harvested from the lateral wall of the maxilla using bone shavers and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite (HA) placed as a graft to elevate the maxillary sinus floor. The histological picture of tissue found in the sinus, the survival rate and the success of the implants were all evaluated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 90 titanium implants were placed in 34 patients. In all of them, the lateral maxillary wall was harvested as a particulate bone graft, subsequently mixed with bovine-derived HA and packed in the sinus cavity. The lateral access window was then covered with a bioresorbable porcine-derived collagen membrane. In 32 sinuses, a two-stage surgery was performed, while in the remaining 10 cases a one-stage surgery was carried out. In the two-stage approach, 14 randomly selected biopsies were obtained at the time of implant insertion after a healing period of 9 months. The histological specimens were histologically and histomorphometrically evaluated.
RESULTS: One implant was lost, leading to a survival rate of 98.9%. The new bone consisted of lamellae of living bone contained osteocytes and in close contact with bovine bone particles that were partly infiltrated by newly formed bone. Bovine bone particle resorption could not be found. The histomorphometric analysis showed the following averages: 29% of newly formed bone and 21% of anorganic bovine bone. The marrow spaces made up the remaining 50% of the specimens.
CONCLUSION: Sinus lift graft with autologous bone harvested from the maxillary lateral wall combined with demineralized bovine bone leads to a predictable outcome regarding the amount of bone formation in sinus floor augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443796     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01877.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  Comparative study of immediately inserted dental implants in sinus lift: 24 months of follow-up.

Authors:  Marcelo Carlos Bortoluzzi; Rafael Manfro; Vinícius Fabris; Rodrigo Cecconello; Estevo D'Agostini Derech
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01

Review 2.  Simultaneous placement of short implants (≤ 8 mm) versus standard length implants (≥ 10 mm) after sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxillae: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenxi Tang; Qianhui Du; Jiaying Luo; Lin Peng
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-05

3.  Histological and micro-computed tomographic observations after maxillary sinus augmentation with porous hydroxyapatite alloplasts: a clinical case series.

Authors:  Hidemi Nakata; Shinji Kuroda; Noriko Tachikawa; Emi Okada; Maho Akatsuka; Shohei Kasugai; Hisatomo Kondo
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-03-02

Review 4.  Alternative intraoral donor sites to the chin and mandibular body-ramus.

Authors:  David Reininger; Carlos Cobo-Vázquez; Benjamin Rosenberg; Juan López-Quiles
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Clinical outcome of implants placed in grafted maxillary sinus via lateral approach: A 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Jinhee Ha; Jang-Ho Son; Iel-Yong Sung; Yeong-Cheol Cho; Jong-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.080

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.