Literature DB >> 20443472

Photoacoustic generation by multiple picosecond pulse excitation.

Tan Liu1, Jing Wang, Georgi I Petrov, Vladislav V Yakovlev, Hao F Zhang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to demonstrate that higher amplitude of ultrashort laser induced photoacoustic signal can be achieved by multiple-pulse excitation when the temporal duration of the pulse train is less than the minimum of the medium's thermal relaxation time and stress relaxation time. Thus, improved signal-to-noise ratio can thus be attained through multiple-pulse excitation while minimizing the energy of each pulse.
METHODS: The authors used a Michelson interferometer together with a picoseconds laser system to introduce two 6 ps pulses separated by a controllable delay by introducing a path length difference between the two arms of the interferometer. The authors then employed a series of three interferometers to create a pulse train consisting of eight pulses. The average pulse energy was 11 nJ and the temporal span of the pulse train was less than 1 ns.
RESULTS: The detected peak-to-peak amplitude of the multiple-pulse induced photoacoustic waves were linearly dependent on the number of pulses in the pulse train and such a linearity held for different optical absorption coefficients. The signal-to-noise ratio improved when the number of pulses increased. Moreover, nonlinear effects were not detected and no photoacoustic saturation effect was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have shown that multiple-pulse excitation improves the signal-to-noise ratio through an accumulated energy deposition effect. This method is invaluable for photoacoustic measurements that require ultrashort laser pulses with minimized pulse energy to avoid laser damage.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20443472      PMCID: PMC2848846          DOI: 10.1118/1.3352666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

1.  Saturation effect in functional photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Tan Liu; Shuliang Jiao; Ruimin Chen; Qifa Zhou; K Kirk Shung; Lihong V Wang; Hao F Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Hao F Zhang; Konstantin Maslov; George Stoica; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06-25       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Limitations of quantitative photoacoustic measurements of blood oxygenation in small vessels.

Authors:  Mathangi Sivaramakrishnan; Konstantin Maslov; Hao F Zhang; George Stoica; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Time-decorrelated multifocal array for multiphoton microscopy and micromachining.

Authors:  D N Fittinghoff; J A Squier
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 3.776

5.  High-speed, low-photodamage nonlinear imaging using passive pulse splitters.

Authors:  Na Ji; Jeffrey C Magee; Eric Betzig
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-01-20       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Cellular response to near-infrared femtosecond laser pulses in two-photon microscopes.

Authors:  K König; P T So; W W Mantulin; E Gratton
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Laser optoacoustic imaging system for detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sergey A Ermilov; Tuenchit Khamapirad; Andre Conjusteau; Morton H Leonard; Ron Lacewell; Ketan Mehta; Tom Miller; Alexander A Oraevsky
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Femtosecond pulse shaping, multiple-pulse spectroscopy, and optical control.

Authors:  H Kawashima; M M Wefers; K A Nelson
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.703

9.  Acoustic fingerprints of dye-labeled protein submicrosphere photoacoustic contrast agents.

Authors:  Michael A McDonald; Ladislav Jankovic; Khalid Shahzad; Michael Burcher; King C P Li
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography.

Authors:  Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Nat Photonics       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 38.771

View more
  7 in total

1.  Stimulated Raman photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Vladislav V Yakovlev; Hao F Zhang; Gary D Noojin; Michael L Denton; Robert J Thomas; Marlan O Scully
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chemically Specific Imaging Through Stimulated Raman Photoexcitation and Ultrasound Detection: Minireview.

Authors:  Vladislav V Yakovlev; Georgi I Petrov; Hao F Zhang; Gary D Noojin; Patrick A Thomas; Michael L Denton; Benjamin A Rockwell; Robert J Thomas
Journal:  Aust J Chem       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 1.321

3.  Investigating femtosecond-laser-induced two-photon photoacoustic generation.

Authors:  Ben E Urban; Ji Yi; Vladislav Yakovlev; Hao F Zhang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Detecting mineral content in turbid medium using nonlinear Raman imaging: feasibility study.

Authors:  Rajan Arora; Georgi I Petrov; Gary D Noojin; Patrick A Thomas; Michael L Denton; Benjamin A Rockwell; Robert J Thomas; Vladislav V Yakovlev
Journal:  J Mod Opt       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 1.464

5.  Monitoring stimulated Raman scattering with photoacoustic detection.

Authors:  Vladislav V Yakovlev; Gary D Noojin; Michael L Denton; Benjamin A Rockwell; Robert J Thomas
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.776

6.  Transducer-matched multipulse excitation for signal-to-noise ratio improvement in diode laser-based photoacoustic systems.

Authors:  Maxim N Cherkashin; Carsten Brenner; Martin R Hofmann
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 7.  Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy.

Authors:  Junjie Yao; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2014-04-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.