Literature DB >> 2044333

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the interaction between flumazenil and midazolam in volunteers by aperiodic EEG analysis.

L T Breimer1, A G Burm, M Danhof, P J Hennis, A A Vletter, J W de Voogt, J Spierdijk, J G Bovill.   

Abstract

The CNS effects resulting from the combined administration of midazolam and flumazenil were studied in 8 healthy volunteers to develop a model of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interaction. Electroencephalograms (EEG) were recorded between Fp1-M1 and Fp2-M2. The EEG parameter total number of waves between 12 and 30 Hz (TNW12-30) derived by aperiodic analysis was used to quantify the effect. Following a 15 min baseline EEG recording, infusion of placebo or flumazenil was started. Infusion regimens for flumazenil were designed so that 'steady-state' concentrations of 10 and 20 micrograms/L were obtained. Doses of midazolam 15, 30 and 60 mg over 5 min were given 30 min after the start of placebo infusion (session A) or flumazenil infusion to 10 micrograms/L (session B) or 20 micrograms/L (session C), respectively. Venous blood samples were taken until 8 h after the start of the flumazenil or placebo infusion. A sigmoid maximum effect (Emax) model was used to characterise the relationship between the plasma concentration of midazolam which is in equilibrium with the effect compartment concentration (Cem) [Cem/Kp] and TNW12-30. Within 2 to 5 min of starting the midazolam infusion all subjects fell asleep, with loss of eyelid reflex. They awoke between 25 and 82 min later in all 3 sessions. The mean (+/- SD) plasma drug concentrations of midazolam corresponding to half the maximum increase in TNW12-30 (EC50) were 276 +/- 64, 624 +/- 187 and 1086 +/- 379 micrograms/L in sessions A, B and C, respectively. The half-lives reflecting equilibration between plasma concentration and effect (t1/2ke0), estimated by a nonparametric method, were 2.2 +/- 1.2, 3.3 +/- 3.3 and 2.9 +/- 1.2 min for the 3 different sessions. Emax and N were not affected by flumazenil. In each subject the plot of the average measured steady-state plasma flumazenil concentration versus the EC50 of midazolam showed a linear relationship. The plasma concentration of flumazenil that doubled the EC50 of midazolam (Cf,2) was 6.5 +/- 1.0 micrograms/L. The observed interaction is consistent with the competitive nature of the antagonism of midazolam by flumazenil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2044333     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199120060-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  23 in total

1.  Investigation in man of the efficacy of a benzodiazepine antagonist, Ro 15-1788.

Authors:  A Darragh; R Lambe; M Scully; I Brick; C O'Boyle; W W Downe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-07-04       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Anesthetic requirements and cardiovascular effects of fentanyl-oxygen and fentanyl-diazepam-oxygen anesthesia in man.

Authors:  T H Stanley; L R Webster
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  The effects of a benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 in the presence of stable concentrations of midazolam.

Authors:  P M Lauven; H Schwilden; H Stoeckel; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Agonist and antagonist benzodiazepine receptor interaction in vitro.

Authors:  H Möhler; J G Richards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-12-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Pharmacokinetics of the selective benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 in man.

Authors:  U Klotz; G Ziegler; I W Reimann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Midazolam-fentanyl anesthesia for major surgery. Plasma levels of midazolam during prolonged total intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  A Nilsson; A Tamsen; P Persson
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Total intravenous anaesthesia with midazolam and flumazenil in outpatient clinics. A comparison with isoflurane or thiopentone.

Authors:  J C Raeder; A Hole; V Arnulf; B H Grynne
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Selective antagonists of benzodiazepines.

Authors:  W Hunkeler; H Möhler; L Pieri; P Polc; E P Bonetti; R Cumin; R Schaffner; W Haefely
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics and clinical use of flumazenil (Ro 15-1788).

Authors:  U Klotz; J Kanto
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Atracurium infusion in total intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  A Nilsson; A Tamsen; M P Persson
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.105

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Electroencephalogram effect measures and relationships between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of centrally acting drugs.

Authors:  J W Mandema; M Danhof
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Flumazenil. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy as a benzodiazepine antagonist.

Authors:  R N Brogden; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Relevance of the application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling concepts in drug development. The "wooden shoe' paradigm.

Authors:  D D Breimer; M Danhof
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in phase I/phase II of drug development.

Authors:  A Van Peer; E Snoeck; M L Huang; J Heykants
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for benzodiazepines.

Authors:  B E Laurijssens; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Strategies to optimise propofol-opioid anaesthesia.

Authors:  Bart-Jan Lichtenbelt; Martijn Mertens; Jaap Vuyk
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  A Response Surface Model Exploration of Dosing Strategies in Gastrointestinal Endoscopies Using Midazolam and Opioids.

Authors:  Jing-Yang Liou; Chien-Kun Ting; Ming-Chih Hou; Mei-Yung Tsou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.