Stefan Priebe1, Fabio Marchi, Lucia Bini, Martina Flego, Ana Costa, Gian Galeazzi. 1. Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Newham Centre for Mental Health, Queen Mary University of London, London E13 8SP, UK. s.priebe@qmul.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Various studies assessed mental disorders and psychological symptoms following natural disasters, including earthquakes. Yet, samples were often non-representative, and the periods of time between earthquake and assessments were usually short. This study aims to assess the prevalence of mental disorders, level of psychological symptoms and subjective quality of life in a random sample in a rural region in Italy 8 years after an earthquake. METHODS: Using a random sampling method, a pool of potential participants of working age who had experienced the earthquake were identified 8 years after the earthquake. They were sequentially approached until the target sample of 200 was reached. Mental disorders were assessed on the MINI, psychological symptoms on the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and subjective quality of life on the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). RESULTS: 200 people were interviewed, and the response rate of contacted people was 43%. In the MINI, 15 participants (7.5%) had any type of mental disorder; 5 participants had PTSD at any time since the earthquake, and 1 participant at the time of the interview. Symptom levels were low (Global Severity Index of BSI mean = 0.29, SD = 0.30; IES total mean = 0.40, SD = 3.33) and subjective quality of life (MANSA mean = 5.26, SD = 0.59) was in a positive range. The distribution of mental health outcomes made it difficult to explore factors associated with them. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that the earthquake had a negative impact on the mental health of the affected population years later. Possible reasons include the relatively weak nature of the earthquake, strong community support that helped overcome mental distress, the long period of time (8 years) between the occurrence of the earthquake and the study, and a capacity of people to maintain or restore mental health after a natural disaster in the long term.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Various studies assessed mental disorders and psychological symptoms following natural disasters, including earthquakes. Yet, samples were often non-representative, and the periods of time between earthquake and assessments were usually short. This study aims to assess the prevalence of mental disorders, level of psychological symptoms and subjective quality of life in a random sample in a rural region in Italy 8 years after an earthquake. METHODS: Using a random sampling method, a pool of potential participants of working age who had experienced the earthquake were identified 8 years after the earthquake. They were sequentially approached until the target sample of 200 was reached. Mental disorders were assessed on the MINI, psychological symptoms on the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and subjective quality of life on the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). RESULTS: 200 people were interviewed, and the response rate of contacted people was 43%. In the MINI, 15 participants (7.5%) had any type of mental disorder; 5 participants had PTSD at any time since the earthquake, and 1 participant at the time of the interview. Symptom levels were low (Global Severity Index of BSI mean = 0.29, SD = 0.30; IES total mean = 0.40, SD = 3.33) and subjective quality of life (MANSA mean = 5.26, SD = 0.59) was in a positive range. The distribution of mental health outcomes made it difficult to explore factors associated with them. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that the earthquake had a negative impact on the mental health of the affected population years later. Possible reasons include the relatively weak nature of the earthquake, strong community support that helped overcome mental distress, the long period of time (8 years) between the occurrence of the earthquake and the study, and a capacity of people to maintain or restore mental health after a natural disaster in the long term.
Authors: Alberto Rossi; Roberta Alberio; Alberto Porta; Marco Sandri; Michele Tansella; Francesco Amaddeo Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Susan H Bland; Luigi Valoroso; Saverio Stranges; Pasquale Strazzullo; Eduardo Farinaro; Maurizio Trevisan Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: H K Armenian; M Morikawa; A K Melkonian; A P Hovanesian; N Haroutunian; P A Saigh; K Akiskal; H S Akiskal Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Chia-Ming Chang; Kathryn M Connor; Te-Jen Lai; Li-Ching Lee; Jonathan R T Davidson Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Patricia d'Ardenne; Nicoletta Capuzzo; Walid K H Fakhoury; Jelena Jankovic-Gavrilovic; Stefan Priebe Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Ali Montazeri; Hamid Baradaran; Sepideh Omidvari; Seyed Ali Azin; Mehdi Ebadi; Gholamreza Garmaroudi; Amir Mahmood Harirchi; Mohammad Shariati Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2005-01-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jasim Anwar; Elias Mpofu; Lynda R Matthews; Ahmed Farah Shadoul; Kaye E Brock Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Marco Valenti; Francesco Masedu; Monica Mazza; Sergio Tiberti; Chiara Di Giovanni; Anna Calvarese; Roberta Pirro; Vittorio Sconci Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-12-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Anna Rita Giuliani; Antonella Mattei; Flavio Santilli; Giovanna Clori; Maria Scatigna; Leila Fabiani Journal: J Community Health Date: 2014-06