| Literature DB >> 20442820 |
Anil Pareek1, P G Yeole, C R Tenpe, Nitin Chandurkar, Ravikiran Payghan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the antihyperglycemic activity of atorvastatin and hydroxychloroquine combination in alloxan-induced diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: Antihyperglycemic activity; alloxan; atorvastatin; hydroxychloroquine; plasma glucose
Year: 2009 PMID: 20442820 PMCID: PMC2861813 DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.55213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharmacol ISSN: 0253-7613 Impact factor: 1.200
Effects of ATV and HCQ on body weight, water and food intake in alloxan-induced diabetic rats
| I. Normal | Untreated | 170 ± 15 | 182 ± 22 | 11 ± 0.8 |
| II. Control | Vehicle orally | 150 ± 12 | 184 ± 18ns | 13 ± 1.0 |
| III. ATV | 10 | 165±13ns | 172 ± 16ns | 12 ± 0.7 ns |
| IV. HCQ | 200 | 160 ±14ns | 180 ± 20ns | 12 ± 0.6 ns |
| V. ATV + HCQ | 5 + 100 | 172 ±18ns | 165 ± 22ns | 11 ± 0.6 |
| VI. ATV + HCQ | 10 + 200 | 182 ± 20 | 164 ± 15ns | 11 ± 1.0 |
Values are expressed as Mean ± S.D. (n= 6).
P<0.05;
P<0.01; ns P>0.05 (non-significant). Result of Group I was compared with Group II and Group II results with Group III, IV, V and VI. ATV- Atorvastatin, HCQ- Hydroxychloroquine
Effects of ATV and HCQ on plasma glucose level in alloxan-induced diabetic rats
| I. Normal | Untreated | 082.1 ± 5.0 | 084.3 ± 7.2 | +03 |
| II. Control | Vehicle orally | 305.2 ± 24.7 | 316.4 ± 23.6 | +04 |
| III. ATV | 10 | 290.4 ± 20.2 | 239.8 ± 28.4 | −17 |
| IV. HCQ | 200 | 302.3 ± 24.5 | 282.2 ± 21.3 | −07 |
| V. ATV + HCQ | 5 + 100 | 296.6 ± 18.1 | 255.2 ± 19.4 | −14 |
| VI. ATV + HCQ | 10 + 200 | 293.3 ± 20.8 | 231.7 ± 14.0 | −21 |
Values are expressed as Mean ± S.D. (n= 6). Statistical analysis was carried out by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Students t-test.
P<0.05;
P<0.01: Result of Group I was compared with Group II and Group II results with Group III, IV, V and VI. ATV- Atorvastatin, HCQ- Hydroxychloroquine
Effects of ATV and HCQ on total protein level in alloxan-induced diabetic rats
| I. Normal | Untreated | 7.43 ± 0.62 | 8.85 ± 0.92 | +19 |
| II. Control | Vehicle Orally | 4.10 ± 0.31 | 4.45 ± 0.28 | +08 |
| III. ATV | 10 | 4.15 ± 0.46 | 4.35 ± 0.18 ns | +05 |
| IV. HCQ | 200 | 4.39 ± 0.12 | 4.96 ± 0.46 ns | +13 |
| V. ATV + HCQ | 5 + 100 | 4.23 ± 0.18 | 5.26 ± 0.74 | +24 |
| VI. ATV + HCQ | 10 + 200 | 4.29 ± 0.27 | 6.00 ± 0.68 | +40 |
Values are expressed as Mean ± S.D. (n= 6). Statistical analysis was carried out by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Students t-test.
P<0.05;
P<0.01: ns P>0.05 (non-significant). Results of Gr. I was compared with Gr. II and Gr. II results with Gr. III, IV, V and VI. ATV- Atorvastatin, HCQ- Hydroxychloroquine