OBJECTIVE: Warfarin dosing remains challenging because of its narrow therapeutic window and large variability in dose response. We sought to analyze new factors involved in its dosing and to evaluate eight dosing algorithms, including two developed by the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC). METHODS: we enrolled 108 patients on chronic warfarin therapy and obtained complete clinical and pharmacy records; we genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms relevant to the VKORC1, CYP2C9, and CYP4F2 genes using integrated fluidic circuits made by Fluidigm. RESULTS: When applying the IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm to our cohort of patients, the percentage of patients within 1 mg/d of the therapeutic warfarin dose increases from 54% to 63% using clinical factors only, or from 38% using a fixed-dose approach. CYP4F2 adds 4% to the fraction of the variability in dose (R) explained by the IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm (P<0.05). Importantly, we show that pooling rare variants substantially increases the R for CYP2C9 (rare variants: P=0.0065, R=6%; common variants: P=0.0034, R=7%; rare and common variants: P=0.00018; R=12%), indicating that relatively rare variants not genotyped in genome-wide association studies may be important. In addition, the IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm and the Gage (2008) algorithm perform best (IWPC: R=50%; Gage: R=49%), and all pharmacogenetic algorithms outperform the IWPC clinical equation (R=22%). VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes did not affect long-term variability in dose. Finally, the Fluidigm platform, a novel warfarin genotyping method, showed 99.65% concordance between different operators and instruments. CONCLUSION: CYP4F2 and pooled rare variants of CYP2C9 significantly improve the ability to estimate warfarin dose.
OBJECTIVE:Warfarin dosing remains challenging because of its narrow therapeutic window and large variability in dose response. We sought to analyze new factors involved in its dosing and to evaluate eight dosing algorithms, including two developed by the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC). METHODS: we enrolled 108 patients on chronic warfarin therapy and obtained complete clinical and pharmacy records; we genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms relevant to the VKORC1, CYP2C9, and CYP4F2 genes using integrated fluidic circuits made by Fluidigm. RESULTS: When applying the IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm to our cohort of patients, the percentage of patients within 1 mg/d of the therapeutic warfarin dose increases from 54% to 63% using clinical factors only, or from 38% using a fixed-dose approach. CYP4F2 adds 4% to the fraction of the variability in dose (R) explained by the IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm (P<0.05). Importantly, we show that pooling rare variants substantially increases the R for CYP2C9 (rare variants: P=0.0065, R=6%; common variants: P=0.0034, R=7%; rare and common variants: P=0.00018; R=12%), indicating that relatively rare variants not genotyped in genome-wide association studies may be important. In addition, the IWPC pharmacogenetic algorithm and the Gage (2008) algorithm perform best (IWPC: R=50%; Gage: R=49%), and all pharmacogenetic algorithms outperform the IWPC clinical equation (R=22%). VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes did not affect long-term variability in dose. Finally, the Fluidigm platform, a novel warfarin genotyping method, showed 99.65% concordance between different operators and instruments. CONCLUSION:CYP4F2 and pooled rare variants of CYP2C9 significantly improve the ability to estimate warfarin dose.
Authors: Mark J Rieder; Alexander P Reiner; Brian F Gage; Deborah A Nickerson; Charles S Eby; Howard L McLeod; David K Blough; Kenneth E Thummel; David L Veenstra; Allan E Rettie Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mitchell K Higashi; David L Veenstra; L Midori Kondo; Ann K Wittkowsky; Sengkeo L Srinouanprachanh; Fred M Farin; Allan E Rettie Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-04-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth A Sconce; Tayyaba I Khan; Hilary A Wynne; Peter Avery; Louise Monkhouse; Barry P King; Peter Wood; Patrick Kesteven; Ann K Daly; Farhad Kamali Journal: Blood Date: 2005-06-09 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Simone Rost; Andreas Fregin; Vytautas Ivaskevicius; Ernst Conzelmann; Konstanze Hörtnagel; Hans-Joachim Pelz; Knut Lappegard; Erhard Seifried; Inge Scharrer; Edward G D Tuddenham; Clemens R Müller; Tim M Strom; Johannes Oldenburg Journal: Nature Date: 2004-02-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jun Wang; Min Lin; Andrew Crenshaw; Amy Hutchinson; Belynda Hicks; Meredith Yeager; Sonja Berndt; Wen-Yi Huang; Richard B Hayes; Stephen J Chanock; Robert C Jones; Ramesh Ramakrishnan Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2009-11-28 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: M A Perera; E Gamazon; L H Cavallari; S R Patel; S Poindexter; R A Kittles; D Nicolae; N J Cox Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Elisa Danese; Sara Raimondi; Martina Montagnana; Angela Tagetti; Taimour Langaee; Paola Borgiani; Cinzia Ciccacci; Antonio J Carcas; Alberto M Borobia; Hoi Y Tong; Cristina Dávila-Fajardo; Mariana Rodrigues Botton; Stephane Bourgeois; Panos Deloukas; Michael D Caldwell; Jim K Burmester; Richard L Berg; Larisa H Cavallari; Katarzyna Drozda; Min Huang; Li-Zi Zhao; Han-Jing Cen; Rocio Gonzalez-Conejero; Vanessa Roldan; Yusuke Nakamura; Taisei Mushiroda; Inna Y Gong; Richard B Kim; Keita Hirai; Kunihiko Itoh; Carlos Isaza; Leonardo Beltrán; Enrique Jiménez-Varo; Marisa Cañadas-Garre; Alice Giontella; Marianne K Kringen; Kari Bente Foss Haug; Hye Sun Gwak; Kyung Eun Lee; Pietro Minuz; Ming Ta Michael Lee; Steven A Lubitz; Stuart Scott; Cristina Mazzaccara; Lucia Sacchetti; Ece Genç; Mahmut Özer; Anil Pathare; Rajagopal Krishnamoorthy; Andras Paldi; Virginie Siguret; Marie-Anne Loriot; Vijay Kumar Kutala; Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz; Jamila Perini; Josh C Denny; Andrea H Ramirez; Balraj Mittal; Saurabh Singh Rathore; Hersh Sagreiya; Russ Altman; Mohamed Hossam A Shahin; Sherief I Khalifa; Nita A Limdi; Charles Rivers; Aditi Shendre; Chrisly Dillon; Ivet M Suriapranata; Hong-Hao Zhou; Sheng-Lan Tan; Vacis Tatarunas; Vaiva Lesauskaite; Yumao Zhang; Anke H Maitland-van der Zee; Talitha I Verhoef; Anthonius de Boer; Monica Taljaard; Carlo Federico Zambon; Vittorio Pengo; Jieying Eunice Zhang; Munir Pirmohamed; Julie A Johnson; Cristiano Fava Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-02-17 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Hua Xu; Min Jiang; Matt Oetjens; Erica A Bowton; Andrea H Ramirez; Janina M Jeff; Melissa A Basford; Jill M Pulley; James D Cowan; Xiaoming Wang; Marylyn D Ritchie; Daniel R Masys; Dan M Roden; Dana C Crawford; Joshua C Denny Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Marianne K Kringen; Kari Bente Foss Haug; Runa M Grimholt; Camilla Stormo; Sigrid Narum; Mimi S Opdal; Jan Toralf Fosen; Armin P Piehler; Per W Johansen; Ingebjørg Seljeflot; Jens Petter Berg; Odd Brørs Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol Date: 2010-11-24