Literature DB >> 20442461

The effect of tomotherapy imaging beam output instabilities on dose calculation.

Michael Duchateau1, Koen Tournel, Dirk Verellen, Iwein Van de Vondel, Truus Reynders, Nadine Linthout, Thierry Gevaert, Peter de Coninck, Tom Depuydt, Guy Storme.   

Abstract

A radiotherapy treatment plan is based on an anatomical 'snapshot' of the patient acquired during the preparation stage using a kVCT (kilovolt computed tomography) scanner. Anatomical changes will occur during the treatment course, in some cases requiring a new treatment plan to deliver the prescribed dose. With the introduction of 3D volumetric on-board imaging devices, it became feasible to use the produced images for dose recalculation. However, the use of these on-board imaging devices in clinical routine for the calculation of dose depends on the stability of the images. In this study the validation of tomotherapy MVCT (megavolt computed tomography) produced images, for the purpose of dose recalculation by the Planned Adaptive software, has been performed. To investigate the validity of MVCT images for dose calculation, a treatment plan was created based on kVCT-acquired images of a solid water phantom. During a period of 4 months, MVCT images of the phantom have been acquired and were used by the planned adaptive software to recalculate the initial kVCT-based dose on the MVCT images. The influence of the adapted IVDTs (image value-to-density tables) has been investigated as well as the effect of image acquisition with or without preceding airscan. Output fluctuations and/or instabilities of the imaging beam result in MV images of different quality yielding different results when used for dose calculation. It was shown that the output of the imaging beam is not stable, leading to differences of nearly 3% between the original kV-based dose and the recalculated MV-based dose, for solid water only. MVCT images can be used for dose calculation purposes bearing in mind that the output beam is liable to fluctuations. The acquisition of an IVDT together with the MVCT image set, that is going to be used for dose calculation, is highly recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20442461     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/11/N03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  The potential of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Dirk Van Gestel; Dirk Verellen; Lien Van De Voorde; Bie de Ost; Geert De Kerf; Olivier Vanderveken; Carl Van Laer; Danielle Van den Weyngaert; Jan B Vermorken; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-30

2.  Improving dose calculations on tomotherapy MVCT images.

Authors:  Frederik Crop; Antoine Bernard; Nick Reynaert
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  A planning study for palliative spine treatment using StatRT and megavoltage CT simulation.

Authors:  Yi Rong; Poonam Yadav; Bhudatt Paliwal; Lu Shang; James S Welsh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Impact of very long time output variation in the treatment of total marrow irradiation with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Yutaka Takahashi; Susanta K Hui
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Stability of the Helical TomoTherapy Hi·Art II detector for treatment beam irradiations.

Authors:  Karin Schombourg; François Bochud; Raphaël Moeckli
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.