Literature DB >> 20442326

Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomical reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations.

Gian M Salzmann1, Lars Walz, Stefan Buchmann, Prapagorn Glabgly, Arne Venjakob, Andreas B Imhoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To achieve reduction of an acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation, novel procedures aim to provide stability and function by restoring the coracoclavicular anatomy. HYPOTHESIS: Anatomical reconstruction for acute AC joint disruption using 2 flip-button devices results in satisfactory clinical function and provides a stable fixation. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: The outcome of 23 consecutive patients (21 men, 2 women; mean age, 37.5 +/- 10.2 years; range, 21-59 years) who underwent anatomical reduction for an acute AC joint dislocation using 2 flip-button devices, each separately replacing 1 coracoclavicular ligament, was evaluated clinically and radiographically preoperatively and 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The evaluation included a visual analog scale for pain, the Constant score, the simple shoulder test, and the Short Form-36. An additional 7 patients had similar surgery during the same period, but 4 were lost to follow-up, 2 required surgical revision, and 1 developed postoperative infection.
RESULTS: There were 3 Rockwood type III, 3 type IV, and 17 type V separations. Mean follow-up was 30.6 +/- 5.4 months (range, 24-40 months). The visual analog scale and Constant score showed significant improvements from preoperative 4.5 +/- 1.9 (range, 1-7) and 34.3 +/- 6.9 (range, 22-44) to postoperative 0.25 +/- 0.5 (range, 0-1) and 94.3 +/- 3.2 (range, 88-98) at 24 months, respectively. Postoperative radiographic AC joint alignment was unsatisfactory in 8 cases, either in the coronal, axillary, or both planes, with no different clinical outcome when compared with the remaining patients.
CONCLUSION: Immediate anatomical reduction of an acute AC separation with flip-button devices provides satisfactory clinical results at intermediate-term follow-up. This technique should be performed by an experienced arthroscopist; tunnel and button placement are of utmost importance to avoid postoperative failure or loss of reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20442326     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509355645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  74 in total

1.  [Arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Greiner; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Jakob V Nüchtern; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Großterlinden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Horizontal and Vertical Stabilization of Acute Unstable Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries Arthroscopy-Assisted.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz; Marina Besalduch; Alexandru Petrica; Ana Escolà; Joaquim Rodriguez; Jan Carlo Fallone
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-23

4.  Recurrent acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an associated coracoid fracture following acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  M Karia; N Al-Hadithy; G Tytherleigh-Strong
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Why does minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using a flip button repair technique fail? An analysis of risk factors and complications.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Steffen B Roßlenbroich; Kristian N Schneider; Christina Theisen; Wolf Petersen; Michael J Raschke; André Weimann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures].

Authors:  T Helfen; G Siebenbürger; B Ockert; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Superior clavicle drilling points and fluoroscopic inclination for anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Takenaga; Masahito Yoshida; Richard E Debski; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl; Albert Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A comparison between two double-button endoscopically assisted surgical techniques for the treatment acute acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  P Vulliet; M Le Hanneur; V Cladiere; P Loriaut; P Boyer
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-08-31

9.  Open capsular and ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus hamstring autograft successfully controls superior and posterior translation for type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Raffaele Garofalo; Enrico Ceccarelli; Alessandro Castagna; Vittorio Calvisi; Brody Flanagin; Marco Conti; Sumant G Krishnan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Tim Saier; Arne J Venjakob; Philipp Minzlaff; Peter Föhr; Filip Lindell; Andreas B Imhoff; Stephan Vogt; Sepp Braun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.