AIM: To evaluate the effect of standard operating procedures (SOPs) to improve the completion of patient care documentation items on patient care reports (PCRs) in a physician-staffed, 4500-calls-per-year preclinical ground emergency medical service (EMS) base. METHODS: Two series of PCRs were analysed before (n=505) and after (n=520) the introduction of SOPs. PCR forms were analysed for the rate of completion of documentation comparing prompted data in check boxes and non-prompted data written in blank spaces at the discretion of the emergency physician. The chi2 test for independence was used to assess the effect of SOPs and prompting on data completion rate. RESULTS: SOPs improved the documentation rate of numerous prompted and non-prompted items, independent of whether these items had a high (eg, Glasgow Coma Score: 91.5% vs 95.7%) or a low documentation rate during the pre-SOP period (eg, allergies: 6.2% vs 18.7%). Prompted items were more frequently documented than non-prompted items, both before and after the introduction of SOPs. Lowest rates were found among non-prompted items (eg, 'last meal' 3.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In this EMS base, developing SOPs is an effective tool to improve the quality of PCRs and the rate of completion of documentation items. Check boxes on PCR forms seem to have an important impact as they prompt the initial assessment, treatment and documentation of the actions taken during an EMS call. Consequently, SOPs and check boxes may serve to improve the transition of important information to emergency department staff, and thus contribute to improved patient care.
AIM: To evaluate the effect of standard operating procedures (SOPs) to improve the completion of patient care documentation items on patient care reports (PCRs) in a physician-staffed, 4500-calls-per-year preclinical ground emergency medical service (EMS) base. METHODS: Two series of PCRs were analysed before (n=505) and after (n=520) the introduction of SOPs. PCR forms were analysed for the rate of completion of documentation comparing prompted data in check boxes and non-prompted data written in blank spaces at the discretion of the emergency physician. The chi2 test for independence was used to assess the effect of SOPs and prompting on data completion rate. RESULTS: SOPs improved the documentation rate of numerous prompted and non-prompted items, independent of whether these items had a high (eg, Glasgow Coma Score: 91.5% vs 95.7%) or a low documentation rate during the pre-SOP period (eg, allergies: 6.2% vs 18.7%). Prompted items were more frequently documented than non-prompted items, both before and after the introduction of SOPs. Lowest rates were found among non-prompted items (eg, 'last meal' 3.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In this EMS base, developing SOPs is an effective tool to improve the quality of PCRs and the rate of completion of documentation items. Check boxes on PCR forms seem to have an important impact as they prompt the initial assessment, treatment and documentation of the actions taken during an EMS call. Consequently, SOPs and check boxes may serve to improve the transition of important information to emergency department staff, and thus contribute to improved patient care.
Authors: David Häske; Stefan K Beckers; Marzellus Hofmann; Rolf Lefering; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Christoph C Wölfl; Paul Grützner; Ulrich Stöckle; Marc Dieroff; Matthias Münzberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kristin Tønsager; Marius Rehn; Kjetil G Ringdal; Hans Morten Lossius; Ilkka Virkkunen; Øyvind Østerås; Jo Røislien; Andreas J Krüger Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 2.655