Literature DB >> 20441975

Determination of sulfite by pervaporation-flow injection with amperometric detection using copper hexacyanoferrate-carbon nanotube modified carbon paste electrode.

Lori Shayne T Alamo1, Tanin Tangkuaram, Sakchai Satienperakul.   

Abstract

A pervaporation-flow injection (PFI) method was developed for the determination of sulfite in selected food samples using a copper hexacyanoferrate-carbon nanotube (CuHCF-CNT)-modified carbon paste electrode. The electrochemical behavior of the modified electrode was observed using cyclic voltammetry in comparison to a CuHCF-modified carbon paste electrode and a bare carbon paste electrode at a scan rate of 100mVs(-1) in 0.10M KNO(3). The bare carbon paste electrode gave the lowest response to sulfite, while the presence of CuHCF made the detection of sulfite possible through electrocatalytic oxidation by the hexacyanoferrate in the modified electrodes. The presence of CNT in the CuHCF-CNT-modified sensor gave the most remarkable current for the detection of sulfite and was then used as a working electrode in the amperometric flow-through cell in the pervaporation flow injection system. The PFI method involves the injection of a standard or sample sulfite solution into a sulfuric acid donor stream to generate sulfur dioxide gas and evaporate into the headspace of the pervaporation unit. The sulfur dioxide diffuses through the PTFE hydrophobic membrane into a potassium nitrate acceptor stream and reverts to the sulfite form, which, subsequently, is transported to the electrochemical flow cell where it is analyzed amperometrically at a CuHCF-CNT-modified electrode at +0.55V (vs. Ag/AgCl). The detection was determined to be applicable in the sulfite concentration range of 0.5-50mgL(-1). The sensitivity, detection limit, and sample throughput were determined to be 2.105nALmg(-1), 0.40mgL(-1) and 11h(-1), respectively. The developed PFI method, coupled with the CuHCF-CNT-modified carbon paste electrode, was applied in the determination of sulfite content in sulfite-containing food products. The results agreed well with those obtained through the officially recommended differential pulse polarographic method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20441975     DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.03.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  4 in total

Review 1.  Improved food additive analysis by ever-increasing nanotechnology.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Shui Hu; Yi Du; Ding Cao; Guirong Wang; Zhiqin Yuan
Journal:  J Food Drug Anal       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 6.157

2.  Critical comparison between modified Monier-Williams and electrochemical methods to determine sulfite in aqueous solutions.

Authors:  C Montes; J H Vélez; G Ramírez; M Isaacs; R Arce; M J Aguirre
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-19

3.  Structural and morphological tuning of Cu-based metal oxide nanoparticles by a facile chemical method and highly electrochemical sensing of sulphite.

Authors:  Velayutham Sudha; Govindhasamy Murugadoss; Rangasamy Thangamuthu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Identification of sulfur fumed Pinelliae Rhizoma using an electronic nose.

Authors:  Xia Zhou; Jun Wan; Liang Chu; Wengang Liu; Yafeng Jing; Chunjie Wu
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.085

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.