Literature DB >> 20441491

The development of a tool to measure service user satisfaction with in-patient forensic services: The Forensic Satisfaction Scale.

Douglas MacInnes1, Dominic Beer, Peter Keeble, David Rees, Leon Reid.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Service-user satisfaction helps determine the quality of services. No valid measure of service-user satisfaction in forensic mental health settings has been developed. AIMS: To develop and validate a scale designed to measure satisfaction with forensic mental health services.
METHOD: Participants were from three forensic mental health units. Items generated from focus groups were developed into a self-report scale and factor analysed. This was administered with a non-forensic satisfaction self-report scale, the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale (VSSS) and assessed for internal consistency and validity.
RESULTS: A 60-item scale was produced comprising seven subscales recording moderate to high levels of internal consistency and concurrent validity with the VSSS.
CONCLUSIONS: The scale is a promising instrument for assessing service-user satisfaction with forensic mental health in-patient services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20441491     DOI: 10.3109/09638231003728133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health        ISSN: 0963-8237


  10 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Validation of a Comprehensive Patient Experience Survey for Addiction and Mental Health that was Co-designed with Service Users.

Authors:  Shawn R Currie; Priscilla Liu; Jassandre Adamyk-Simpson; Jesse Stanich
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2020-01-01

3.  A cross sectional survey examining the association between therapeutic relationships and service user satisfaction in forensic mental health settings.

Authors:  Douglas MacInnes; Helen Courtney; Tracy Flanagan; Daniel Bressington; Dominic Beer
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-09-18

4.  It's the talk: a study of involvement initiatives in secure mental health settings.

Authors:  Mick McKeown; Fiona Jones; Karen Wright; Helen Spandler; Joanna Wright; Holly Fletcher; Joy Duxbury; Jolene McVittie; Wayne Turton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Improving the quality of prison research: A qualitative study of ex-offender service user involvement in prison suicide prevention research.

Authors:  Yvonne F Awenat; Currie Moore; Patricia A Gooding; Fiona Ulph; Aisha Mirza; Daniel Pratt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  The Forensic Restrictiveness Questionnaire: Development, Validation, and Revision.

Authors:  Jack Tomlin; Birgit Völlm; Vivek Furtado; Vincent Egan; Peter Bartlett
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Study to assess the effect of a structured communication approach on quality of life in secure mental health settings (Comquol): study protocol for a pilot cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Douglas MacInnes; Catherine Kinane; Dominic Beer; Janet Parrott; Tom Craig; Sandra Eldridge; Ian Marsh; Joanna Krotofil; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  A pilot cluster randomised trial to assess the effect of a structured communication approach on quality of life in secure mental health settings: The Comquol Study.

Authors:  Douglas MacInnes; Catherine Kinane; Janet Parrott; Jacqueline Mansfield; Tom Craig; Sandra Eldridge; Ian Marsh; Claire Chan; Natalia Hounsome; George Harrison; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 9.  Measuring the Patient Experience of Mental Health Care: A Systematic and Critical Review of Patient-Reported Experience Measures.

Authors:  Sara Fernandes; Guillaume Fond; Xavier Yves Zendjidjian; Karine Baumstarck; Christophe Lançon; Fabrice Berna; Franck Schurhoff; Bruno Aouizerate; Chantal Henry; Bruno Etain; Ludovic Samalin; Marion Leboyer; Pierre-Michel Llorca; Magali Coldefy; Pascal Auquier; Laurent Boyer
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  A tool to evaluate proportionality and necessity in the use of restrictive practices in forensic mental health settings: the DRILL tool (Dundrum restriction, intrusion and liberty ladders).

Authors:  Harry G Kennedy; Ronan Mullaney; Paul McKenna; John Thompson; David Timmons; Pauline Gill; Owen P O'Sullivan; Paul Braham; Dearbhla Duffy; Anthony Kearns; Sally Linehan; Damian Mohan; Stephen Monks; Lisa McLoughlin; Paul O'Connell; Conor O'Neill; Brenda Wright; Ken O'Reilly; Mary Davoren
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.630

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.