Literature DB >> 20441487

Mental health users' experiences of being interviewed by another user in a research project. A qualitative study.

A Bengtsson-Tops1, B Svensson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although user involvement in research is an area of high priority there is a lack of knowledge about how users of the mental health system perceive participation in studies carried out by other users. AIM: The aim of the study was to describe how users experience participation in research interviews performed by other users.
METHOD: A varied sample of 17 mental health users with experience of being interviewed in a research project by another user was thematically interviewed in this qualitative study. Data was subject to content analysis.
RESULTS: Being interviewed by another user was a special experience including both negative and positive aspects, and took place in an atmosphere of comradeship. However, being interviewed by another user could generate feelings of insecurity. This finding indicates requirements from the informants how to perform user-involved research in the future.
CONCLUSIONS: In planning for user-involved research education, it is necessary to consider training and issues related to secure ethical principals concerning the informants.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20441487     DOI: 10.3109/09638230903531084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ment Health        ISSN: 0963-8237


  8 in total

Review 1.  'The missing links': understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research.

Authors:  Kristina Staley; Sarah A Buckland; Helen Hayes; Maryrose Tarpey
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Getting it right! Enhancing youth involvement in mental health research.

Authors:  Lauren Mawn; Patrick Welsh; Lauren Kirkpatrick; Lisa A D Webster; Helen J Stain
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Participatory Research as One Piece of the Puzzle: A Systematic Review of Consumer Involvement in Design of Technology-Based Youth Mental Health and Well-Being Interventions.

Authors:  Simone Kate Orlowski; Sharon Lawn; Anthony Venning; Megan Winsall; Gabrielle M Jones; Kaisha Wyld; Raechel A Damarell; Gaston Antezana; Geoffrey Schrader; David Smith; Philippa Collin; Niranjan Bidargaddi
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2015-07-09

5.  What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Louise Dudley; Carrol Gamble; Jennifer Preston; Deborah Buck; Bec Hanley; Paula Williamson; Bridget Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Involving young people in BRIGHTLIGHT from study inception to secondary data analysis: insights from 10 years of user involvement.

Authors:  Rachel M Taylor; Jeremy S Whelan; Faith Gibson; Sue Morgan; Lorna A Fern
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-12-27

7.  You realise you are better when you want to live, want to go out, want to see people: Recovery as assemblage.

Authors:  Inger Beate Larsen; Jan Georg Friesinger; Monica Strømland; Alain Topor
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-21

8.  Hearing the voices of service user researchers in collaborative qualitative data analysis: the case for multiple coding.

Authors:  Angela Sweeney; Kathryn E Greenwood; Sally Williams; Til Wykes; Diana S Rose
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.377

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.