Literature DB >> 20440776

Increased model for end-stage liver disease score at the time of liver transplant results in prolonged hospitalization and overall intensive care unit costs.

Matthew R Foxton1, Mohammad A B Al-Freah, Andrew J Portal, Elizabeth Sizer, William Bernal, Georg Auzinger, Mohamed Rela, Julia A Wendon, Nigel D Heaton, John G O'Grady, Michael A Heneghan.   

Abstract

Organ allocation based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) resulted in decreased waiting list mortality in the United States. However, reports suggest an increase in resource utilization as a consequence of this. The aim of this study is to assess the correlation of MELD at transplant with post-liver transplant (LT) intensive care unit (ICU) costs. We assessed clinical and demographic variables of 402 adult patients who underwent LT at King's College Hospital, London, UK, between January 2000 and December 2003. ICU cost calculations were based on the therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS). Graft quality was assessed using the donor risk index (DRI). Patients with a MELD score > 24 had significantly longer post-LT ICU stay (P < 0.0001) and total post-LT hospital stay (P = 0.008). In addition, they had significantly increased TISS scores, ICU cost, and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) (P < 0.001). MELD score (by point) and MELD > 24 was associated with prolonged ICU stay (P = 0.004 and P = 0.005, respectively). On univariate analysis, etiology of alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), repeat LT, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and refractory ascites were associated with prolonged ICU stay. Using multivariate analysis, MELD > 24, refractory ascites, ALD and Budd-Chiari syndrome were associated with prolonged ICU stay. There was no association between using grafts with higher DRI and longer ICU stay, need for RRT, increased cost, or hospital survival on univariate analyses (P = not significant). Use of MELD as a method of organ allocation results in significant increase in ICU cost after LT. Using TISS as surrogate marker for ICU costs reveals that the cost implications are related to the need for RRT and prolonged ICU stay. 2010 AASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20440776     DOI: 10.1002/lt.22027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  26 in total

1.  Value of the SOFA score as a predictive model for short-term survival in high-risk liver transplant recipients with a pre-transplant labMELD score ≥ 30.

Authors:  Harald Schrem; Melanie Reichert; Benedikt Reichert; Thomas Becker; Frank Lehner; Moritz Kleine; Hüseyin Bektas; Kai Johanning; Christian P Strassburg; Jürgen Klempnauer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Centre volume and resource consumption in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher W Macomber; Joshua J Shaw; Heena Santry; Reza F Saidi; Nicolas Jabbour; Jennifer F Tseng; Adel Bozorgzadeh; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  Liver resection and transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  J Belghiti; D Fuks
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 4.  Prioritization for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Evangelos Cholongitas; Giacomo Germani; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Frequency of musculoskeletal complications among the patients receiving solid organ transplantation in a tertiary health-care center.

Authors:  Shafieh Movassaghi; Mohsen Nasiri Toosi; Alireza Bakhshandeh; Fatemeh Niksolat; Zahra Khazaeipour; Ali Tajik
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  MELD-good for many, not as good for others … at least for now.

Authors:  Thomas Schiano
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 7.  HCC: current surgical treatment concepts.

Authors:  F Cauchy; D Fuks; J Belghiti
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Living donor liver transplantation for high model for end-stage liver disease score: What have we learned?

Authors:  Hany Dabbous; Mohammad Sakr; Sara Abdelhakam; Iman Montasser; Mohamed Bahaa; Hany Said; Mahmoud El-Meteini
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-08

Review 9.  Predictive factors of short term outcome after liver transplantation: A review.

Authors:  Giuliano Bolondi; Federico Mocchegiani; Roberto Montalti; Daniele Nicolini; Marco Vivarelli; Lesley De Pietri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Liver transplantation in adults: Choosing the appropriate timing.

Authors:  Maria Siciliano; Lucia Parlati; Federica Maldarelli; Massimo Rossi; Stefano Ginanni Corradini
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.