Literature DB >> 20440519

Pedicle versus laminar screws: what provides more suitable C2 fixation in congenital C2-3 fusion patients?

Shenglin Wang1, Chao Wang, Peter G Passias, Ming Yan, Haitao Zhou.   

Abstract

Patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS) have congenital fusions of at least 1 cervical motion segment, and often present with compensatory hypermobility or symptomatic stenosis of the cranio-vertebral junction which requires occipitocervical reconstruction and fusion. One subgroup of KFS patients in which this is particularly common is those with isolated C2-3 congenital fusion (C2-3 CF). The anatomic suitability for C2 pedicle and laminar screw placement had been analyzed in the general adult population, and guidelines for their techniques had been established. However, the feasibility and safety of the two techniques in KFS patients with congenital C2-3 fusion has not been reported. This radiographic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of these two widely used methods in such patients. We recruited 108 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation and reconstructed CTs were performed. Among them, 53 had C2-C3 congenital fusion diagnosed as KFS and 55 had normal cervical segmentation (NCS). The maximum possible diameters and length were measured along the ideal screw trajectories. Both of mean diameters and lengths of the C2 laminar screw trajectory in the C2-3 CF group were significantly larger than that in NCS. Mean diameters of the C2 pedicle screw trajectory in this group were significantly smaller than that in NCS group, however, C2-3 CF patients had longer pedicle paths than NCS. In the C2-3 CF group, all 53 cases had suitable trajectory for C2 laminar screw, while 21 (39.6%) had a pedicle diameter less than 4.5 mm. In the NCS group, 5 cases (9.1%) had a pedicle diameter less than 4.5 mm. All 108 cases had sufficient diameters for C2 laminar screw placement. Klippel-Feil patients with C2-3 CF are good candidates for the technique of C2 laminar screw. Preoperative radiography should be carefully evaluated and the option of C2 fixation be determined with a thorough consideration in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20440519      PMCID: PMC2989187          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1418-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  21 in total

1.  Posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems.

Authors:  K Abumi; T Takada; Y Shono; K Kaneda; M Fujiya
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques.

Authors:  Marcus Richter; René Schmidt; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note.

Authors:  Neill M Wright
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-04

4.  Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; J Duranceau; V Goel; T Oxland; K Takata
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement.

Authors:  Clayton L Dean; Michael J Lee; Mark Robbin; Ezequiel H Cassinelli
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Anatomic consideration of C2 pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  N Ebraheim; J R Rollins; R Xu; W T Jackson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Patterned expression in familial Klippel-Feil syndrome.

Authors:  R A Clarke; J H Kearsley; D A Walsh
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1996-03

8.  Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques.

Authors:  Robert P Melcher; Christian M Puttlitz; Frank S Kleinstueck; Jeffrey C Lotz; Juergen Harms; David S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation.

Authors:  J Harms; R P Melcher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Klippel-Feil syndrome: clinical features and current understanding of etiology.

Authors:  M R Tracy; J P Dormans; K Kusumi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  10 in total

1.  The options of C2 fixation for os odontoideum: a radiographic study for the C2 pedicle and lamina anatomy.

Authors:  Xian-zhong Meng; Jia-xin Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Anatomical considerations of C2 lamina for the placement of translaminar screw: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Chytas; D S Korres; G C Babis; N E Efstathopoulos; E C Papadopoulos; K Markatos; V S Nikolaou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-11-08

3.  Deviation analysis of C2 translaminar screw placement assisted by a novel rapid prototyping drill template: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Yong Hu; Zhen-shan Yuan; William Ryan Spiker; Todd J Albert; Wei-xin Dong; Hui Xie; Jian-bing Yuan; Cheng-tao Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A retrospective study of congenital osseous anomalies at the craniocervical junction treated by occipitocervical plate-rod systems.

Authors:  Xianjun Ding; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Hideki Sudo; Masahiko Takahata; Ken Nagahama; Akira Iwata
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Can C1 lateral mass and C3 pedicle screw fixation be used as an option for atlantoaxial reduction and stabilization in Klippel-Feil patients? A study of its morphological feasibility, technical nuances, and clinical efficiency.

Authors:  Yue-Qi Du; Yi-Heng Yin; Teng Li; Guang-Yu Qiao; Xin-Guang Yu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Anatomical analysis of the C2 pedicle in patients with basilar invagination.

Authors:  Ruipei Xiao; Juedong Hou; Yang Zhou; Jintao Zheng; Xiaobao Zou; Yongjian Zhu; Ling Yao; Xiangyang Ma; Jianting Chen; Jincheng Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.721

7.  Morphological and clinical feasibility of C3 pedicle screw instrumentation in patients with congenital C2-3 fusion.

Authors:  Peng Xiu; Qing Wang; Gaoju Wang; Song Wang; Guidong Dai; Yongshu Lan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Congenital variations of the upper cervical spine and their importance in preoperative diagnosis. A case report and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou; Michael Athanassacopoulos; Panagiotis K Karampinas; John Vlamis; Demetrios S Korres; Spiros G Pneumaticos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-04-06

9.  Atlantoaxial dislocation with congenital "sandwich fusion" in the craniovertebral junction: a retrospective case series of 70 patients.

Authors:  Yinglun Tian; Nanfang Xu; Ming Yan; Peter G Passias; Frank A Segreto; Shenglin Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The Feasibility of Translaminar Screws in the Subaxial Cervical Spine: Computed Tomography and Cadaveric Validation.

Authors:  Woojin Cho; Jason T Le; Adam L Shimer; Brian C Werner; John A Glaser; Francis H Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.