Literature DB >> 20440121

Physical performance and electromyographic responses to an acute bout of paired set strength training versus traditional strength training.

Daniel W Robbins1, Warren B Young, David G Behm, Warren R Payne, Marc D Klimstra.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the acute effects of performing paired set (PS) vs. traditional set (TS) training over 3 consecutive sets on volume load (VL) and electromyographic (EMG) activity of the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, latissimus dorsi, and trapezius muscles. Following a familiarization session 16 trained males performed 2 testing protocols using 4 repetition maximum loads: TS (3 sets of bench pull [Bpull] followed by 3 sets of bench press [Bpress] performed in approximately 20 minutes) or PS (3 sets of Bpull and 3 sets of Bpress performed in an alternating manner in approximately 10 minutes). Bpull and Bpress VL decreased significantly from set 1 to set 2 and from set 2 to set 3 under both conditions. There was no difference between VL per set, or over the sessions, between the 2 conditions. PS was determined to be more efficient (VL/time) as compared to TS. EMG activity of the 4 monitored muscles was not different for the 2 conditions or within each condition over the 3 sets. However, there was a significant within-set response in EMG activity in the Bpress exercise. The data suggest that a 4-minute rest interval between sets may not be adequate to maintain VL using either protocol. The data further suggest that PS training may be as effective as TS training in terms of VL maintenance and more effective in terms of efficiency. The comparison of EMG activity between the PS and TS protocols suggests that the level of neuromuscular fatigue does not differ under the 2 conditions. PS training would appear to be an effective method of exercise with respect to VL maintenance and efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20440121     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc60ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Acute Effect of Upper-Lower Body Super-Set vs. Traditional-Set Configurations on Bar Execution Velocity and Volume.

Authors:  Guillermo Peña García-Orea; David Rodríguez-Rosell; Daniel Segarra-Carrillo; Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto; Noelia Belando-Pedreño
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14

2.  Maximal repetition performance, rating of perceived exertion, and muscle fatigue during paired set training performed with different rest intervals.

Authors:  Marianna de Freitas Maia; Gabriel Andrade Paz; Humberto Miranda; Vicente Lima; Claudio Melibeu Bentes; Jefferson da Silva Novaes; Patrícia Dos Santos Vigário; Jeffrey Michael Willardson
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.103

3.  Strengthening the Gluteus Medius Using Various Bodyweight and Resistance Exercises.

Authors:  Petr Stastny; James J Tufano; Artur Golas; Miroslav Petr
Journal:  Strength Cond J       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 4.  Resistance Training Safety during and after the SARS-Cov-2 Outbreak: Practical Recommendations.

Authors:  Paulo Gentil; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; Daniel Souza; Alfonso Jimenez; Xian Mayo; Anna Luiza de Fátima Pinho Lins Gryschek; Erica Gomes Pereira; Pedro Alcaraz; Antonino Bianco; Antonio Paoli; Julio Papeschi; Luiz Carlos Carnevali Junior
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.