Literature DB >> 20439926

The use of fixed appliances in the UK: a survey of specialist orthodontists.

Phil Banks1, Victoria Elton, Yvonne Jones, Peter Rice, Serena Derwent, Lang'o Odondi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of fixed appliances in the UK.
DESIGN: Prospective postal questionnaire.
SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: All members of the General Dental Council Specialist List in Orthodontics still in active practice and not in training posts.
METHOD: A preemptive letter of explanation was sent inviting orthodontists to participate in the survey. The questionnaire was subsequently posted to 935 specialists. Data analysis investigated differences in clinical practice related to varying provider groups, level of operator experience and geographical region.
RESULTS: The response rate achieved was 66.3%. A majority of orthodontists routinely used the 0.022 inch pre-adjusted edgewise system, standard size Siamese pattern stainless steel brackets, conventionally ligated and bonded using standard etch and light cured composite. Nickel titanium and stainless steel were the most popular archwire materials. Anchorage was supported routinely by palatal and lingual arches in up to 25% and by headgear in over a third of respondents. Newer innovations showed variable popularity. Self-etching primer was used routinely by one-third of respondents with 11% use of self-ligating brackets. Banding of first molars was preferred by over 60% of clinicians. Bone screw implants were used by only 0.2% of respondents. Clinicians with less than 10 years experience used more headgear, light curing, MBT prescription and molar bonding. Operators with over 20 years experience used more chemically cured bonding, Roth prescription, banded first molars, 0.018 inch slot size and Tip-Edge(TM), with less use of headgear. Fixed appliance use differed from that reported in the US with lower use in the UK of standard edgewise and Roth systems, aesthetic, miniaturised and 0.018 inch slot brackets and rapid maxillary expansion.
CONCLUSION: Most UK orthodontic specialists routinely used the 0.022 inch pre-adjusted edgewise system with standard size Siamese steel brackets bonded using standard etch and light cured composite with conventional ligation. Variations were seen between different provider groups, types of treatment funding, levels of operator seniority and geographical regions. Differences were noted particularly in the use of bracket prescription and design, types of molar attachment and anchorage control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20439926     DOI: 10.1179/14653121042867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthod        ISSN: 1465-3125


  10 in total

1.  Incidence of bracket failure during orthognathic surgery: a comparison of two techniques to establish interim maxillomandibular fixation.

Authors:  Reed Attishia; Joseph E Van Sickels; Larry L Cunningham
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-09-28

2.  Retention Protocols and Factors Affecting Retainer Choice among Iraqi Orthodontists.

Authors:  Mushriq F Abid; Ali M Al-Attar; Akram F Alhuwaizi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-10-23

3.  Do orthodontists aim to decrease the duration of fixed appliance treatment?

Authors:  Mushriq F Abid; Akram F Alhuwaizi; Ali M Al-Attar
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2021-02-19

4.  Assessment of dimensional accuracy of preadjusted metal injection molding orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Shiva Alavi; Farnaz Tajmirriahi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016-09

5.  Clinical evaluation of marketed orthodontic products: are researchers behind the times? A meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Jadbinder Seehra; Nikolaos Pandis; Padhraig S Fleming
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Management of maxillary impacted canines: A prospective study of orthodontists' preferences.

Authors:  Hamad Alqahtani
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of orthodontic mini implants in clinical practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Reint Meursinge Reynders; Laura Ronchi; Luisa Ladu; Nicola Di Girolamo; Jan de Lange; Nia Roberts; Sharon Mickan
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-23

8.  Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of orthodontic mini-implants in clinical practice: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Reint Meursinge Reynders; Laura Ronchi; Luisa Ladu; Nicola Di Girolamo; Jan de Lange; Nia Roberts; Sharon Mickan
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-05

Review 9.  Incidence of orthodontic brackets detachment during orthodontic treatment: A systematic review.

Authors:  Naif Almosa; Hamayun Zafar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?

Authors:  Laura Bernés Martínez; Daniele Garcovich; Pilar España Pamplona; Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín; Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.151

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.