BACKGROUND: Disease activity is highly variable in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), both untreated and during interferon (IFN)-beta therapy. Breakthrough disease is often regarded as treatment failure; however, apart from neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), no blood biomarkers have been established as reliable indicators of treatment response, despite substantial, biologically measurable effects. We studied the biologic response to treatment in a cohort of NAb-negative patients to test whether difference in responsiveness could segregate patients with and without breakthrough disease during therapy. METHODS: Gene expression in blood cells from 23 patients with relapsing-remitting MS was analyzed by microarray and PCR. Samples were collected pretreatment and 9-12 hours after IFNbeta injection at 3 and 6 months' treatment. Definition of breakthrough disease was based on the occurrence of relapses, disability progression, or subclinical activity on 3T MRI at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had breakthrough disease and 7 patients were stable. Microarray and PCR showed marked effects of IFNbeta on gene expression profiles, but biologic responses did not differ between patients with breakthrough disease and stable patients. However, pretreatment variables did differ: patients with breakthrough disease had lower baseline IL10 expression, more gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and a higher number and volume of T2 lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Breakthrough disease during interferon (IFN)-beta treatment is not paralleled by differences in biologic responsiveness to treatment in NAb-negative patients; most likely, the spontaneously occurring variation in underlying disease activity between patients causes the varying level of breakthrough disease observed in IFNbeta-treated patients with multiple sclerosis.
BACKGROUND: Disease activity is highly variable in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), both untreated and during interferon (IFN)-beta therapy. Breakthrough disease is often regarded as treatment failure; however, apart from neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), no blood biomarkers have been established as reliable indicators of treatment response, despite substantial, biologically measurable effects. We studied the biologic response to treatment in a cohort of NAb-negative patients to test whether difference in responsiveness could segregate patients with and without breakthrough disease during therapy. METHODS: Gene expression in blood cells from 23 patients with relapsing-remitting MS was analyzed by microarray and PCR. Samples were collected pretreatment and 9-12 hours after IFNbeta injection at 3 and 6 months' treatment. Definition of breakthrough disease was based on the occurrence of relapses, disability progression, or subclinical activity on 3T MRI at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had breakthrough disease and 7 patients were stable. Microarray and PCR showed marked effects of IFNbeta on gene expression profiles, but biologic responses did not differ between patients with breakthrough disease and stable patients. However, pretreatment variables did differ: patients with breakthrough disease had lower baseline IL10 expression, more gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and a higher number and volume of T2 lesions. CONCLUSIONS:Breakthrough disease during interferon (IFN)-beta treatment is not paralleled by differences in biologic responsiveness to treatment in NAb-negative patients; most likely, the spontaneously occurring variation in underlying disease activity between patients causes the varying level of breakthrough disease observed in IFNbeta-treated patients with multiple sclerosis.
Authors: Helle Bach Søndergaard; Finn Sellebjerg; Jan Hillert; Tomas Olsson; Ingrid Kockum; Magdalena Lindén; Inger-Lise Mero; Kjell-Morten Myhr; Elisabeth G Celius; Hanne F Harbo; Jeppe Romme Christensen; Lars Börnsen; Per Soelberg Sørensen; Annette Bang Oturai Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Antonio Bertolotto; Marco Capobianco; Maria Pia Amato; Elisabetta Capello; Ruggero Capra; Diego Centonze; Maria Di Ioia; Antonio Gallo; Luigi Grimaldi; Luisa Imberti; Alessandra Lugaresi; Chiara Mancinelli; Maria Giovanna Marrosu; Lucia Moiola; Enrico Montanari; Silvia Romano; Luigina Musu; Damiano Paolicelli; Francesco Patti; Carlo Pozzilli; Silvia Rossi; Marco Salvetti; Gioachino Tedeschi; Maria Rosaria Tola; Maria Trojano; Maria Troiano; Mauro Zaffaroni; Simona Malucchi Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2013-12-29 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: Finn Sellebjerg; Martin Krakauer; Signe Limborg; Dan Hesse; Henrik Lund; Annika Langkilde; Helle Bach Søndergaard; Per Soelberg Sørensen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael Hecker; Brigitte Katrin Paap; Robert Hermann Goertsches; Ole Kandulski; Christian Fatum; Dirk Koczan; Hans-Peter Hartung; Hans-Juergen Thiesen; Uwe Klaus Zettl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lars Börnsen; Jeppe Romme Christensen; Rikke Ratzer; Chris Hedegaard; Helle B Søndergaard; Martin Krakauer; Dan Hesse; Claus H Nielsen; Per S Sorensen; Finn Sellebjerg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bart Van Wijmeersch; Barry A Singer; Aaron Boster; Simon Broadley; Óscar Fernández; Mark S Freedman; Guillermo Izquierdo; Jan Lycke; Carlo Pozzilli; Basil Sharrack; Brian Steingo; Heinz Wiendl; Sibyl Wray; Tjalf Ziemssen; Luke Chung; David H Margolin; Karthinathan Thangavelu; Patrick Vermersch Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 6.312