Literature DB >> 20439832

Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: a sham-controlled randomized trial.

Mark S George1, Sarah H Lisanby, David Avery, William M McDonald, Valerie Durkalski, Martina Pavlicova, Berry Anderson, Ziad Nahas, Peter Bulow, Paul Zarkowski, Paul E Holtzheimer, Theresa Schwartz, Harold A Sackeim.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Daily left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been studied as a potential treatment for depression, but previous work had mixed outcomes and did not adequately mask sham conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether daily left prefrontal rTMS safely and effectively treats major depressive disorder.
DESIGN: Prospective, multisite, randomized, active sham-controlled (1:1 randomization), duration-adaptive design with 3 weeks of daily weekday treatment (fixed-dose phase) followed by continued blinded treatment for up to another 3 weeks in improvers.
SETTING: Four US university hospital clinics. PATIENTS: Approximately 860 outpatients were screened, yielding 199 antidepressant drug-free patients with unipolar nonpsychotic major depressive disorder. INTERVENTION: We delivered rTMS to the left prefrontal cortex at 120% motor threshold (10 Hz, 4-second train duration, and 26-second intertrain interval) for 37.5 minutes (3000 pulses per session) using a figure-eight solid-core coil. Sham rTMS used a similar coil with a metal insert blocking the magnetic field and scalp electrodes that delivered matched somatosensory sensations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In the intention-to-treat sample (n = 190), remission rates were compared for the 2 treatment arms using logistic regression and controlling for site, treatment resistance, age, and duration of the current depressive episode.
RESULTS: Patients, treaters, and raters were effectively masked. Minimal adverse effects did not differ by treatment arm, with an 88% retention rate (90% sham and 86% active). Primary efficacy analysis revealed a significant effect of treatment on the proportion of remitters (14.1% active rTMS and 5.1% sham) (P = .02). The odds of attaining remission were 4.2 times greater with active rTMS than with sham (95% confidence interval, 1.32-13.24). The number needed to treat was 12. Most remitters had low antidepressant treatment resistance. Almost 30% of patients remitted in the open-label follow-up (30.2% originally active and 29.6% sham).
CONCLUSION: Daily left prefrontal rTMS as monotherapy produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful antidepressant therapeutic effects greater than sham. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00149838.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20439832     DOI: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  242 in total

1.  Impact of meditation training on the default mode network during a restful state.

Authors:  Véronique A Taylor; Véronique Daneault; Joshua Grant; Geneviève Scavone; Estelle Breton; Sébastien Roffe-Vidal; Jérôme Courtemanche; Anaïs S Lavarenne; Guillaume Marrelec; Habib Benali; Mario Beauregard
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Stuck in a rut: rethinking depression and its treatment.

Authors:  Paul E Holtzheimer; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 3.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Ketamine for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: current evidence.

Authors:  Sanjay J Mathew; Asim Shah; Kyle Lapidus; Crystal Clark; Noor Jarun; Britta Ostermeyer; James W Murrough
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 5.  [Therapeutic applications of closed-loop brain stimulation. Success and expectations].

Authors:  C Zrenner; U Ziemann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transiently increases cue-induced craving for methamphetamine: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Xingbao Li; Robert J Malcolm; Kristina Huebner; Colleen A Hanlon; Joseph J Taylor; Kathleen T Brady; Mark S George; Ronald E See
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Reliability of targeting methods in TMS for depression: Beam F3 vs. 5.5 cm.

Authors:  Nicholas T Trapp; Joel Bruss; Marcie King Johnson; Brandt D Uitermarkt; Laren Garrett; Amanda Heinzerling; Chaorong Wu; Timothy R Koscik; Patrick Ten Eyck; Aaron D Boes
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Cortical control of affective networks.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar; Sherilynn J Black; Rainbo Hultman; Steven T Szabo; Kristine D DeMaio; Jeanette Du; Brittany M Katz; Guoping Feng; Herbert E Covington; Kafui Dzirasa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Modulation of motor cortex excitability predicts antidepressant response to prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Daniel Press; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Interventional psychiatry: how should psychiatric educators incorporate neuromodulation into training?

Authors:  Nolan R Williams; Joseph J Taylor; Jonathan M Snipes; E Baron Short; Edward M Kantor; Mark S George
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.