OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of early school-based screening and educational interventions on longer-term outcomes for children at risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the predictive utility of teacher ratings. DESIGN: A population-based 5-year follow-up of a randomized, school-based intervention. SETTING: Schools in England. PARTICIPANTS: Children between 4 and 5 years of age with high teacher-rated hyperactivity/inattention scores. Follow-up data were collected on 487 children in 308 schools. INTERVENTIONS: Following screening, using a 2 x 2 factorial design, schools randomly received an educational intervention (books about ADHD for teachers), the names of children with high hyperactivity/inattention scores between ages 4 and 5 years (identification), botheducational intervention and identification, or no intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: Parent-rated hyperactivity/inattention, impairment in classroom learning, and access to specialist health services for mental health or behavioral problems. RESULTS: None of the interventions were associated with improved outcomes. However, children receiving the identification-only intervention were twice as likely as children in the no-intervention group to have high hyperactivity/inattention scores at follow-up (adjusted odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.00). Regardless of intervention, high baseline hyperactivity/inattention scores were associated with high hyperactivity/inattention and specialist health service use at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence of long-term, generalizable benefits following a school-based universal screening program for ADHD. There may be adverse effects associated with labeling children at a young age.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of early school-based screening and educational interventions on longer-term outcomes for children at risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the predictive utility of teacher ratings. DESIGN: A population-based 5-year follow-up of a randomized, school-based intervention. SETTING: Schools in England. PARTICIPANTS: Children between 4 and 5 years of age with high teacher-rated hyperactivity/inattention scores. Follow-up data were collected on 487 children in 308 schools. INTERVENTIONS: Following screening, using a 2 x 2 factorial design, schools randomly received an educational intervention (books about ADHD for teachers), the names of children with high hyperactivity/inattention scores between ages 4 and 5 years (identification), both educational intervention and identification, or no intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: Parent-rated hyperactivity/inattention, impairment in classroom learning, and access to specialist health services for mental health or behavioral problems. RESULTS: None of the interventions were associated with improved outcomes. However, children receiving the identification-only intervention were twice as likely as children in the no-intervention group to have high hyperactivity/inattention scores at follow-up (adjusted odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.00). Regardless of intervention, high baseline hyperactivity/inattention scores were associated with high hyperactivity/inattention and specialist health service use at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence of long-term, generalizable benefits following a school-based universal screening program for ADHD. There may be adverse effects associated with labeling children at a young age.
Authors: Renata R Kieling; Christian Kieling; Ana Paula Aguiar; Adriana C Costa; Beatriz V Dorneles; Luis A Rohde Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Nathaniel von der Embse; Andrew S Jenkins; Kenneth Christensen; Stephen Kilgus; Maithili Mishra; Brianna Chin Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2021-02-01
Authors: Eric J Bruns; Mylien T Duong; Aaron R Lyon; Michael D Pullmann; Clayton R Cook; Douglas Cheney; Elizabeth McCauley Journal: Am J Orthopsychiatry Date: 2016-03
Authors: Paul Hodgkins; L Eugene Arnold; Monica Shaw; Hervé Caci; Jennifer Kahle; Alisa G Woods; Susan Young Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Paul Stallard; Kapil Sayal; Rhiannon Phillips; John A Taylor; Melissa Spears; Rob Anderson; Ricardo Araya; Glyn Lewis; Abigail Millings; Alan A Montgomery Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-10-05
Authors: Kapil Sayal; David Daley; Marilyn James; Min Yang; Martin J Batty; John A Taylor; Sarah Pass; Christopher James Sampson; Edward Sellman; Althea Valentine; Chris Hollis Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-09-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Eva Norén Selinus; Yasmina Molero; Paul Lichtenstein; Tomas Larson; Sebastian Lundström; Henrik Anckarsäter; Clara Hellner Gumpert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240