Literature DB >> 20439661

Reference accuracy in peer-reviewed pediatric orthopaedic literature.

Jon R Davids1, Daniel M Weigl, Joye P Edmonds, Dawn W Blackhurst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reference accuracy of articles published in the biomedical literature is determined by the presence of citation and quotation errors. A recent review demonstrated that the median citation error rate per biomedical journal was 39%, and the median quotation error rate per journal was 20%. Reference accuracy in pediatric orthopaedic articles has not been previously reported, to our knowledge.
METHODS: Two hundred references from twenty articles published in four peer-reviewed orthopaedic journals were randomly selected for assessment of citation and quotation accuracy. Full-text copies of all original references were obtained by interlibrary loan methods and reviewed directly to establish citation accuracy. The presence of citation errors was determined by a single investigator. The relevance of citation errors was determined by assessing the ease of reference retrieval through PubMed. Quotation accuracy was determined by two examiners who reviewed each of the twenty articles and 200 references to compare the claims made for the references in the article against the data and opinions expressed in the actual reference.
RESULTS: The total citation error rate across all of the journals was 26% (fifty-one of 200 references) with a 95% confidence interval of 16.5% to 37.3%. The median citation error rate per journal was 27% (range, 10% to 38%). Although citation errors were common, most were of minimal significance, as 196 of the 200 references could be retrieved with ease from PubMed. The total quotation error rate across all of the articles was 38% (152 of 398 reference citations) with a 95% confidence interval of 30.1% to 47.0%. The median quotation error rate per journal was 38% (range, 28% to 46%).
CONCLUSIONS: Citation and quotation errors are common in the pediatric orthopaedic literature. Reference accuracy continues to be a substantial problem in the biomedical literature despite recent technological advances such as online databases, easily accessible search engines, and widely available bibliographic software.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20439661     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  The virtues of correct citation: careful referencing is important but is often neglected/even in peer reviewed articles.

Authors:  Stephan Mertens; Christopher Baethge
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Quotation errors related to the Proximal Fracture of the Humerus Evaluation by Randomization (ProFHER) study.

Authors:  Rahul Bagga; Peter Cay; David Ricketts; Tom Roper; Joideep Phadnis
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-08-17

3.  Quotation Errors in High-Impact-Factor Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Journals.

Authors:  Aaron Gazendam; Daniel Cohen; Samuel Morgan; Seper Ekhtiari; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-08-25

4.  Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study.

Authors:  Bruno R da Costa; Myriam Cevallos; Douglas G Altman; Anne W S Rutjes; Matthias Egger
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Quotation accuracy in medical journal articles-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah Jergas; Christopher Baethge
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.

Authors:  Armen Yuri Gasparyan; Marlen Yessirkepov; Alexander A Voronov; Alexey N Gerasimov; Elena I Kostyukova; George D Kitas
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 7.  Accuracy of cited "facts" in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate.

Authors:  Scott A Mogull
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews.

Authors:  Jennifer A Byrne
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2016-09-04

9.  Significance and implications of accurate and proper citations in clinical research studies.

Authors:  Micah Ngatuvai; Cody Autrey; Mark McKenny; Adel Elkbuli
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-11

10.  Quotation Accuracy of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols on Acupuncture.

Authors:  José M Morán; María Romero-Moreno; Azucena Santillán-García; Ivan Herrera-Peco
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.