Literature DB >> 20438359

Integrated postprandial responses of the diamondback water snake, Nerodia rhombifer.

Christian L Cox1, Stephen M Secor.   

Abstract

Among snakes, the magnitude to which intestinal performance is regulated with feeding and fasting is adaptively linked to their natural feeding frequency. For infrequently feeding boas and pythons, gastrointestinal form and function are widely regulated with each feeding bout. In contrast, snakes that naturally feed more frequently modestly regulate intestinal function with each meal. To further explore the postprandial responses of a frequently feeding snake and assess whether such responses are matched in magnitude, we examined the postprandial metabolic, morphologic, and functional responses of the diamondback water snake (Nerodia rhombifer) following the consumption of catfish meals equaling 25% of their body mass. After feeding, N. rhombifer experienced 5.4-fold increases in metabolic rate and a specific dynamic action of 101 kJ that equaled 25.3% of the ingested energy. Nerodia rhombifer that were fed did not undergo any change in stomach tissue mass but did experience a rapid drop in gastric pH and a decline in tissue stores of pepsinogen. Feeding triggered an increase in pancreatic mass and a temporary loss of trypsin activity. The small intestine of N. rhombifer responded to feeding with a 70% increase in mass and a 27% increase in enterocyte length but no change in microvillus length. Intestinal nutrient uptake rates did not increase with feeding, whereas intestinal aminopeptidase-N activity increased by fivefold. The postprandial increases in metabolism and gastrointestinal morphology and function of N. rhombifer are of a lower magnitude than is characteristic of infrequently feeding snakes and are more similar to the responses observed for other frequently feeding species. In support of an adaptive interplay between feeding habits and digestive physiology, this study demonstrates that the regulation of gastrointestinal structure and function for the frequently feeding N. rhombifer is generally modest and matched in magnitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20438359     DOI: 10.1086/648737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool        ISSN: 1522-2152            Impact factor:   2.247


  7 in total

1.  Physiological responses to short-term fasting among herbivorous, omnivorous, and carnivorous fishes.

Authors:  Ryan D Day; Ian R Tibbetts; Stephen M Secor
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Phylogenetic analysis of standard metabolic rate of snakes: a new proposal for the understanding of interspecific variation in feeding behavior.

Authors:  Daniel Rodrigues Stuginski; Carlos Arturo Navas; Fábio Cury de Barros; Agustín Camacho; José Eduardo Pereira Wilken Bicudo; Kathleen Fernandes Grego; José Eduardo de Carvalho
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Sustained endocrine and exocrine function in the pancreas of the Pacific spiny dogfish post-feeding.

Authors:  Alyssa M Weinrauch; Frauke Fehrmann; W Gary Anderson
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.794

4.  Physiological and morphological responses to the first bout of refeeding in southern catfish (Silurus meridionalis).

Authors:  Ling-Qing Zeng; Shi-Jian Fu; Xiu-Ming Li; Feng-Jie Li; Bin Li; Zhen-Dong Cao; Yao-Guang Zhang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Acidic digestion in a teleost: postprandial and circadian pattern of gastric pH, pepsin activity, and pepsinogen and proton pump mRNAs expression.

Authors:  Manuel Yúfera; Francisco J Moyano; Antonio Astola; Pedro Pousão-Ferreira; Gonzalo Martínez-Rodríguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Multi-species comparisons of snakes identify coordinated signalling networks underlying post-feeding intestinal regeneration.

Authors:  Blair W Perry; Audra L Andrew; Abu Hena Mostafa Kamal; Daren C Card; Drew R Schield; Giulia I M Pasquesi; Mark W Pellegrino; Stephen P Mackessy; Saiful M Chowdhury; Stephen M Secor; Todd A Castoe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Energy expenses on prey processing are comparable, but paid at a higher metabolic scope and for a longer time in ambush vs active predators: a multispecies study on snakes.

Authors:  Stanisław Bury
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.