Literature DB >> 20438264

Neuropsychological evidence for visual- and motor-based affordance: effects of reference frame and object-hand congruence.

Glyn W Humphreys1, Melanie Wulff, Eun Young Yoon, M Jane Riddoch.   

Abstract

Two experiments are reported that use patients with visual extinction to examine how visual attention is influenced by action information in images. In Experiment 1 patients saw images of objects that were either correctly or incorrectly colocated for action, with the objects held by hands that were congruent or incongruent with those used premorbidly by the patients. The images were also shown from a 1st- and 3rd-person perspective. There was an overall reduction in extinction for objects colocated for action. In addition, there was an extra benefit when the objects were held in hands congruent with those used by the patients and when the objects were seen from a 1st-person perspective. This last result fits with an effect of motor simulation, over and above a purely visual effect based on positioning objects correctly for action. Experiment 2 showed that effects of hand congruence could emerge with images depicted from a 3rd-person perspective when patients saw themselves holding the objects. The data indicate 2 effects of action information on extinction: (a) an effect of colocating objects for action, which does not depend on a self-reference frame (a visual effect), and (b) an effect sensitive to object-hand congruence, which does depend on a self-reference frame (a motor-based effect). The self-reference frame is induced when stimuli are viewed from a 1st-person perspective and when an image of the self is seen from a 3rd-person perspective. Both visual and motor-based effects of action information facilitate the spread of attention across objects. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20438264     DOI: 10.1037/a0019317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  8 in total

1.  Selecting object pairs for action: Is the active object always first?

Authors:  Rosanna Laverick; Melanie Wulff; Juliane J Honisch; Wei Ling Chua; Alan M Wing; Pia Rotshtein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Impaired texture segregation but spared contour integration following damage to right posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Johan Wagemans; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Try to see it my way: Embodied perspective enhances self and friend-biases in perceptual matching.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Luis J Fuentes; Glyn W Humphreys; Jie Sui
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-05-13

4.  Manipulable objects facilitate cross-modal integration in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Michiel van Elk; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mechanisms underlying selecting objects for action.

Authors:  Melanie Wulff; Rosanna Laverick; Glyn W Humphreys; Alan M Wing; Pia Rotshtein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Attending to the possibilities of action.

Authors:  Glyn W Humphreys; Sanjay Kumar; Eun Young Yoon; Melanie Wulff; Katherine L Roberts; M Jane Riddoch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Effects of broken affordance on visual extinction.

Authors:  Melanie Wulff; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.