Literature DB >> 20437866

Molecular subtype approximated by quantitative estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her2 can predict the prognosis of breast cancer.

Xiao-song Chen1, Chuan-dong Ma, Jia-yi Wu, Wen-tao Yang, Hong-fen Lu, Jiong Wu, Jin-song Lu, Zhi-min Shao, Zhen-zhou Shen, Kun-wei Shen.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of breast cancer subtypes classified by quantitative estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Her2. METHODS AND STUDY
DESIGN: 923 patients with primary breast cancer having a median age of 53 years who were treated at the Cancer Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai between January 2002 and June 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. Four molecular subtypes were constructed from the immunohistochemical results of quantitative hormone receptor (HR) and Her2 status. HR+ was defined as ER+ and PR+, HR+/- as ER/PR+ at lower levels or lacking either ER or PR, and HR- as both ER- and PR-. The four subtypes were HR+/Her2-, HR+/-/Her2-, HR-/Her2- (triple-negative), and Her2+. Clinical and pathological parameters, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) measurements were compared between patients with different molecular subtypes.
RESULTS: The proportions of HR+/Her2-, HR+/-/Her2-, triple-negative, and Her2+ breast cancer were 36.6% (338/923), 22.9% (211/923), 20.6% (190/923), and 19.9% (194/923). The median follow-up was 49.0 months (4-77 months). In 145 cases disease recurrence or death occurred. In multivariate analysis with the HR+/Her2- subtype taken as the reference category, triple-negative and Her2+ subtypes were associated with increased recurrence and death with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.05 (95% CI 1.31-3.20; P = 0.002) and 1.89 (95% CI 1.20-2.97, P = 0.006) for DFS and 2.84 (95% CI 1.45-5.55; P = 0.002) and 2.95 (95% CI 1.51-5.77, P = 0.002) for OS, respectively; the HR+/-/Her2- subtype was marginally associated with poor prognosis with HR 1.51 (95% CI 0.94-2.43; P = 0.088) and 1.90 (95% CI 0.92-3.94; P = 0.084) for DFS and OS, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer subtypes based on quantitative ER, PR, and Her2 may be predictive of prognosis. Patients whose tumors were not HR+/Her2- had a worse outcome in our study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20437866     DOI: 10.1177/030089161009600117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumori        ISSN: 0300-8916


  17 in total

1.  Analysis of matrix metalloproteinase-1 gene polymorphisms and expression in benign and malignant breast tumors.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Constance Brinckerhoff; Susan Lubert; Kui Yang; Jasmine Saini; Jeffrey Hooke; Richard Mural; Craig Shriver; Stella Somiari
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  [18F]FDG PET/CT features for the molecular characterization of primary breast tumors.

Authors:  Lidija Antunovic; Francesca Gallivanone; Martina Sollini; Andrea Sagona; Alessandra Invento; Giulia Manfrinato; Margarita Kirienko; Corrado Tinterri; Arturo Chiti; Isabella Castiglioni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Differentiation of Breast Lesions, Histpathologic Subgroups and Correlatıon with Prognostıc Factors using 3.0 Tesla MR.

Authors:  Yasin Akın; M Ümit Uğurlu; Handan Kaya; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-07-01

4.  Correlation of ER, PR and HER-2/Neu with other Prognostic Factors in Infiltrating Ductal Carcinoma of Breast.

Authors:  Sepideh Siadati; Majid Sharbatdaran; Novin Nikbakhsh; Naser Ghaemian
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2015

5.  Outcomes of her2-positive early-stage breast cancer in the trastuzumab era: a population-based study of Canadian patients.

Authors:  U Zurawska; D A Baribeau; S Giilck; C Victor; S Gandhi; A Florescu; S Verma
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Testes-specific protease 50 promotes cell proliferation via inhibiting activin signaling.

Authors:  Z-B Song; P Wu; J-S Ni; T Liu; C Fan; Y-L Bao; Y Wu; L-G Sun; C-L Yu; Y-X Huang; Y-X Li
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Aggressive treatment for hepatic metastases from breast cancer: results from a single center.

Authors:  F Polistina; G Costantin; A Febbraro; E Robusto; G Ambrosino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Hormone receptors and age distribution in breast cancer patients at a university hospital in northern egypt.

Authors:  Osama Hussein; Mahmoud Mosbah; Omar Farouk; Kamel Farag; Aiman El-Saed; Mohammad Arafa; Ahmed Abdallah
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2013-06-12

9.  A multigene predictor of metastatic outcome in early stage hormone receptor-negative and triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Christina Yau; Laura Esserman; Dan H Moore; Fred Waldman; John Sninsky; Christopher C Benz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  The diverse distribution of risk factors between breast cancer subtypes of ER, PR and HER2: a 10-year retrospective multi-center study in China.

Authors:  Qingkun Song; Rong Huang; Jing Li; Jinhu Fan; Shan Zheng; Bin Zhang; Hongjian Yang; Zhonghua Tang; Jianjun He; Xiaoming Xie; Hui Li; Jiayuan Li; Youlin Qiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.