Literature DB >> 20437183

Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods.

Jae Young Hong1, Seung Woo Suh, Hitesh N Modi, Chang Yong Hur, Hae Ryong Song, Jong Hoon Park.   

Abstract

Several methods are used to measure lumbar lordosis. In adult scoliosis patients, the measurement is difficult due to degenerative changes in the vertebral endplate as well as the coronal and sagittal deformity. We did the observational study with three examiners to determine the reliability of six methods for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis patients. Ninety lateral lumbar radiographs were collected for the study. The radiographs were divided into normal (Cobb < 10 degrees ), low-grade (Cobb 10 degrees -19 degrees ), high-grade (Cobb >or= 20 degrees ) group to determine the reliability of Cobb L1-S1, Cobb L1-L5, centroid, posterior tangent L1-S1, posterior tangent L1-L5 and TRALL method in adult scoliosis. The 90 lateral radiographs were measured twice by each of the three examiners using the six measurement methods. The data was analyzed to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability. In general, for the six radiographic methods, the inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were all >or=0.82. A comparison of the ICCs and 95% CI for the inter- and intra-observer reliability between the groups with varying degrees of scoliosis showed that, the reliability of the lordosis measurement decreased with increasing severity of scoliosis. In Cobb L1-S1, centroid and posterior tangent L1-S1 methods, the ICCs were relatively lower in the high-grade scoliosis group (>or=0.60). And, the mean absolute difference (MAD) in these methods was high in the high-grade scoliosis group (<or=7.17 degrees ). However, in the Cobb L1-L5 and posterior tangent L1-L5 method, the ICCs were >or=0.86 in all groups. And, in the TRALL method, the ICCs were >or=0.76 in all groups. In addition, in the Cobb L1-L5 and posterior tangent L1-L5 method, the MAD was <or=3.63 degrees . And, in the TRALL method, the MAD was <or=3.84 degrees in all groups. We concluded that the Cobb L1-L5 and the posterior tangent L1-L5 methods are reliable methods for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis. And the TRALL method is more reliable method than other methods which include the L5-S1 joint in lordosis measurement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20437183      PMCID: PMC2989293          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1422-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine.

Authors:  John Cheung; Dirk J Wever; Albert G Veldhuizen; Jean P Klein; Bert Verdonck; Rutger Nijlunsing; Jan C Cool; Jim R Van Horn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-07-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Frank J Schwab; Vinson A Smith; Michele Biserni; Lorenzo Gamez; Jean-Pierre C Farcy; Murali Pagala
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Lumbopelvic lordosis and pelvic balance on repeated standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and untreated patients with constant low back pain.

Authors:  R P Jackson; T Kanemura; N Kawakami; C Hales
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The effect of posture on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M A Adams; W C Hutton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-08

5.  Reliability of centroid, Cobb, and Harrison posterior tangent methods: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis.

Authors:  D E Harrison; R Cailliet; D D Harrison; T J Janik; B Holland
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods.

Authors:  D E Harrison; D D Harrison; R Cailliet; T J Janik; B Holland
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Reliability analysis for manual radiographic measures of rotatory subluxation or lateral listhesis in adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Brett A Freedman; William C Horton; John M Rhee; Charles C Edwards; Timothy R Kuklo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction.

Authors:  M Bernhardt; K H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Changes in scoliotic curvature and lordotic angle during the early phase of degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Murata; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Eiji Hanaoka; Takehiko Utsumi; Masatsune Yamagata; Hideshige Moriya
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; J Li; C Y Wu; J A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  13 in total

1.  Pelvic Floor Symptoms and Spinal Curvature in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Tatum A McArthur; Ying Tang; Jessica L McKinney; Sarah L Morgan; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

2.  Static and dynamic sagittal lumbar apex: a new concept for the assessment of lumbar lordosis distribution in spinal deformity.

Authors:  Chizuo Iwai; Javier Pizones; Louis Boissière; Sreenath Jakinapally; Çaglar Yilgor; Daniel Larrieu; Ferran Pellise; Jean-Marc Vital; Anouar Bourghli; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Simple prediction method of lumbar lordosis for planning of lumbar corrective surgery: radiological analysis in a Korean population.

Authors:  Chong Suh Lee; Sung Soo Chung; Se Jun Park; Dong Min Kim; Seong Kee Shin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Radiographic measurement reliability of lumbar lordosis in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Jung Sub Lee; Tae Sik Goh; Shi Hwan Park; Hong Seok Lee; Kuen Tak Suh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A novel tool to provide predictable alignment data irrespective of source and image quality acquired on mobile phones: what engineers can offer clinicians.

Authors:  Teng Zhang; Chuang Zhu; Qiaoyun Lu; Jun Liu; Ashish Diwan; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The Amount of Proximal Lumbar Lordosis Is Related to Pelvic Incidence.

Authors:  Sebastien Pesenti; Renaud Lafage; Daniel Stein; Jonathan C Elysee; Lawrence G Lenke; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Measurement of lumbosacral angle in normal radiographs: a retrospective study in southeast Nigeria.

Authors:  Fo Okpala
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2014-09

8.  The effect of the retroperitoneal transpsoas minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion on segmental and regional lumbar lordosis.

Authors:  Tien V Le; Andrew C Vivas; Elias Dakwar; Ali A Baaj; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-08-02

9.  Radiographic Parameters in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis and Different Parameters Between Sagittal Balanced and Imbalanced ADS Patients.

Authors:  Changwei Yang; Mingyuan Yang; Yuanyuan Chen; Xianzhao Wei; Haijian Ni; Ziqiang Chen; Jingfeng Li; Yushu Bai; Xiaodong Zhu; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Comparison between methods of assessing lumbosacral curve obtained by radiographic image.

Authors:  Daiane Aparecida Vacari; Eduardo Borba Neves; Leandra Ulbricht
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.