OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between current hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) use and 2 indicators of glycemic control, fasting glucose and insulin sensitivity, in nondiabetic women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Nondiabetic women with SLE (n = 149) or RA (n = 177) recruited between 2000 and 2005 for a cross-sectional evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors were characterized by HCQ usage status. Unadjusted and multivariately adjusted mean fasting glucose, median insulin, and insulin resistance [assessed by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) calculation] were compared among HCQ users and nonusers for disease-specific groups. RESULTS: More women with SLE were taking HCQ than those with RA (48% vs 18%; p < 0.0001; mean dose ~ 400 mg vs ~ 200 mg). For women with SLE or RA, after adjustment for age, waist circumference, disease duration, prednisone dosage, C-reactive protein, menopausal status, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and disease-specific indicators, serum glucose was lower in HCQ users than in nonusers (SLE: 85.9 vs 89.3 mg/dl, p = 0.04; RA: 82.5 vs 86.6 mg/dl, p = 0.05). In women with SLE, HCQ use also was associated with lower (log)HOMA-IR (0.97 vs 1.12, p = 0.09); in those with RA, no differences in (log)HOMA-IR were seen. HCQ usage was not associated with fasting insulin levels in either patient group. CONCLUSION: HCQ use was associated with lower fasting glucose in women with SLE or RA and also lower (log)HOMA-IR in the SLE group. The use of HCQ may be beneficial for reducing cardiovascular risk by improving glycemic control in these patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between current hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) use and 2 indicators of glycemic control, fasting glucose and insulin sensitivity, in nondiabeticwomen with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS:Nondiabeticwomen with SLE (n = 149) or RA (n = 177) recruited between 2000 and 2005 for a cross-sectional evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors were characterized by HCQ usage status. Unadjusted and multivariately adjusted mean fasting glucose, median insulin, and insulin resistance [assessed by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) calculation] were compared among HCQ users and nonusers for disease-specific groups. RESULTS: More women with SLE were taking HCQ than those with RA (48% vs 18%; p < 0.0001; mean dose ~ 400 mg vs ~ 200 mg). For women with SLE or RA, after adjustment for age, waist circumference, disease duration, prednisone dosage, C-reactive protein, menopausal status, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and disease-specific indicators, serum glucose was lower in HCQ users than in nonusers (SLE: 85.9 vs 89.3 mg/dl, p = 0.04; RA: 82.5 vs 86.6 mg/dl, p = 0.05). In women with SLE, HCQ use also was associated with lower (log)HOMA-IR (0.97 vs 1.12, p = 0.09); in those with RA, no differences in (log)HOMA-IR were seen. HCQ usage was not associated with fasting insulin levels in either patient group. CONCLUSION:HCQ use was associated with lower fasting glucose in women with SLE or RA and also lower (log)HOMA-IR in the SLE group. The use of HCQ may be beneficial for reducing cardiovascular risk by improving glycemic control in these patients.
Authors: F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1988-03
Authors: E M Tan; A S Cohen; J F Fries; A T Masi; D J McShane; N F Rothfield; J G Schaller; N Talal; R J Winchester Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1982-11
Authors: Alka M Kanaya; David Herrington; Eric Vittinghoff; Feng Lin; Deborah Grady; Vera Bittner; Jane A Cauley; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: A Doria; Y Shoenfeld; R Wu; P F Gambari; M Puato; A Ghirardello; B Gilburd; S Corbanese; M Patnaik; S Zampieri; J B Peter; E Favaretto; L Iaccarino; Y Sherer; S Todesco; P Pauletto Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Chun Li; X R Wang; H J Ji; X Y Zhang; X F Li; L Z Wang; C H Wang; Y F Wang; Rong Yang; G C Wang; Xin Lu; Ping Zhu; L N Chen; H T Jin; J T Liu; X Y Liu; Lin Sun; H Y Chen; Ping Wei; J X Wang; L F Cui; Rong Shu; B L Liu; Z L Zhang; G T Li; Z B Li; Jing Yang; J F Li; Bin Jia; F X Zhang; J M Tao; S L Han; J Y Lin; M Q Wei; X M Liu; Dan Ke; S X Hu; Cong Ye; X Y Yang; Hao Li; C B Huang; Ming Gao; Bei Lai; X F Li; L J Song; Yi Wang; X Y Wang; Y D Tang; Yin Su; Rong Mu; Z G Li Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Scott J Pilla; Amy Q Quan; Emily L Germain-Lee; David B Hellmann; Nestoras N Mathioudakis Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 4.810