OBJECTIVE: It is suggested that patients with acromegaly have an increased risk of colorectal cancer and pre-malignant adenomatous polyps. However, the optimum frequency with which colonoscopic screening should be offered remains unclear. DESIGN: To determine the optimum frequency for repeated colonoscopic surveillance of acromegalic patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the case records of all patients with acromegaly seen in our centre since 1992: 254 patients had at least one surveillance colonoscopy, 156 patients had a second surveillance colonoscopy, 60 patients had a third surveillance colonoscopy and 15 patients had a fourth surveillance colonoscopy. RESULTS: The presence of hyperplastic or adenomatous polyps was assessed in all patients, while one cancer was detected at the second surveillance. At the third surveillance, mean (+/-s.d.) serum IGF1 levels (ng/ml) in patients with hyperplastic polyps were significantly higher than those with normal colons (P<0.05). The presence of an adenoma rather than a normal colon at the first colonoscopy was associated with a significantly increased risk of adenoma at the second (odds ratio (OR) 4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-10.4) and at the third (OR 8.8, 95% CI 2.9-26.5) screens. Conversely, a normal colon at the first surveillance gave a high chance of normal findings at the second (78%) or third surveillance (78%), and a normal colon at the second colonoscopy was associated with normality at the third colonoscopy (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated colonoscopic screening of patients with acromegaly demonstrated a high prevalence of new adenomatous and hyperplastic colonic polyps, dependent on both the occurrence of previous polyps and elevated IGF1 levels.
OBJECTIVE: It is suggested that patients with acromegaly have an increased risk of colorectal cancer and pre-malignant adenomatous polyps. However, the optimum frequency with which colonoscopic screening should be offered remains unclear. DESIGN: To determine the optimum frequency for repeated colonoscopic surveillance of acromegalicpatients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the case records of all patients with acromegaly seen in our centre since 1992: 254 patients had at least one surveillance colonoscopy, 156 patients had a second surveillance colonoscopy, 60 patients had a third surveillance colonoscopy and 15 patients had a fourth surveillance colonoscopy. RESULTS: The presence of hyperplastic or adenomatous polyps was assessed in all patients, while one cancer was detected at the second surveillance. At the third surveillance, mean (+/-s.d.) serum IGF1 levels (ng/ml) in patients with hyperplastic polyps were significantly higher than those with normal colons (P<0.05). The presence of an adenoma rather than a normal colon at the first colonoscopy was associated with a significantly increased risk of adenoma at the second (odds ratio (OR) 4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-10.4) and at the third (OR 8.8, 95% CI 2.9-26.5) screens. Conversely, a normal colon at the first surveillance gave a high chance of normal findings at the second (78%) or third surveillance (78%), and a normal colon at the second colonoscopy was associated with normality at the third colonoscopy (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated colonoscopic screening of patients with acromegaly demonstrated a high prevalence of new adenomatous and hyperplastic colonic polyps, dependent on both the occurrence of previous polyps and elevated IGF1 levels.
Authors: Sripriya Raman; Adda Grimberg; Steven G Waguespack; Bradley S Miller; Charles A Sklar; Lillian R Meacham; Briana C Patterson Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Maria Luisa Torre; Giuseppina T Russo; Marta Ragonese; Annalisa Giandalia; Ernesto De Menis; Giorgio Arnaldi; Angela Alibrandi; Carmelo Buda; Giovanni Romanello; Elisabetta L Romeo; Domenico Cucinotta; Francesco Trimarchi; Salvatore Cannavo Journal: Pituitary Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: M Parolin; F Dassie; L Russo; S Mazzocut; M Ferrata; E De Carlo; R Mioni; F Fallo; R Vettor; C Martini; P Maffei Journal: Pituitary Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Elizabeth A Jensen; Jonathan A Young; Jaycie Kuhn; Maria Onusko; Joshua Busken; Edward O List; John J Kopchick; Darlene E Berryman Journal: Pituitary Date: 2021-08-09 Impact factor: 4.107