Literature DB >> 20435489

A method for documenting the change in center of rotation with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and its application to a consecutive series of 68 shoulders having reconstruction with one of two different reverse prostheses.

Matthew D Saltzman1, Deana M Mercer, Winston J Warme, Alexander L Bertelsen, Frederick A Matsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty changes the center of rotation (COR) of the glenohumeral joint and in doing so affects the resting tension in the deltoid and residual cuff muscles, as well as their respective moment arms. The purpose of this study was to assess the change in COR from the preoperative to postoperative state in a group of patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The position of the COR in relation to a scapular coordinate system was determined for the anteroposterior and axillary radiographs before and after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for 68 shoulders (63 patients) receiving either a Delta prosthesis or an Encore Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, the COR was superiorly displaced a mean of 9 ± 7 mm from the origin of the coordinate system. For all shoulders, the postoperative COR was inferiorly displaced by 12 mm to a position 3 ± 3 mm below the coordinate origin (P < .001) and medially displaced by 27 ± 4 mm from the coordinate origin (P < .001) in the anteroposterior projection. For the shoulders receiving the Delta prosthesis, the COR was inferiorly displaced by 2 ± 3 mm from the coordinate origin, whereas it was inferiorly displaced by 7 ± 3 mm with the Encore prosthesis (P < .001). The COR was medially displaced by 28 ± 4 mm with the Delta prosthesis and by 19 ± 3 mm with the Encore prosthesis (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The position of the COR relative to the scapula is significantly altered by reverse shoulder arthroplasty and is significantly different for 2 different implant designs.
Copyright © 2010 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20435489     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty: The Singapore General Hospital experience and a simple method of measuring change in the center-of-rotation.

Authors:  Chay-You Ang; Kah-Weng Lai; Denny Lie Tjiauw Tjoen; Paul Chang Chee Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-06-10

2.  Short term results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aditya K Agrawal; Carlos Wigderowitz; Bruno Ribeiro; Amar Malhas; Abhishek Vaish; Rami Abboud
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-08-12

3.  Immediate postoperative radiographs after shoulder arthroplasty are often poor quality and do not alter care.

Authors:  Surena Namdari; Jason E Hsu; Matthew Baron; Matthew Barron; G Russell Huffman; David Glaser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Benchmarking off-the-shelf statistical shape modeling tools in clinical applications.

Authors:  Anupama Goparaju; Krithika Iyer; Alexandre Bône; Nan Hu; Heath B Henninger; Andrew E Anderson; Stanley Durrleman; Matthijs Jacxsens; Alan Morris; Ibolya Csecs; Nassir Marrouche; Shireen Y Elhabian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 5.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Biomechanics.

Authors:  Christopher P Roche
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2022-01-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.