Literature DB >> 20435246

Pharmacodynamic modeling of intravenous antibiotics against gram-negative bacteria collected in the United States.

Pornpan Koomanachai1, Catharine C Bulik, Joseph L Kuti, David P Nicolau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the era of escalating antimicrobial resistance, the choice of effective empiric antimicrobial therapy has become considerably more difficult. In an attempt to improve antimicrobial selection, pharmacodynamic modeling that considers the drug, dose, dosing interval, and duration of infusion is increasingly used as a tool to assist in the clinical decision-making process.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the PASSPORT (Probability of target attainment of Antibacterial agents Studied for Susceptibility and Pharmacodynamic Optimization in Regional Trials) study was to compare the probabilities of achieving requisite pharmacodynamic exposure (eg, T>MIC, AUC/MIC) of common intravenous antibiotics against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
METHODS: Using a 5000-patient Monte Carlo simulation, pharmacodynamic analyses were conducted for standard and high-dose, prolonged (ie, 3-to 4-hour) infusions of cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam in adult patients with normal renal function (>or=50 mL/min). MIC data were incorporated from the 2008 TRUST (Tracking Resistance in the United States Today)-12 surveillance program, a long-running resistance study in 56 participating US hospitals. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was determined for each regimen against each population of E coli, K pneumoniae, A baumannii, and P aeruginosa. Optimal CFR was defined a priori as >or=90%.
RESULTS: All of the beta-lactam regimens had optimal CFRs against E coli, and all but piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g q6h had optimal CFRs against K pneumoniae. The fluoroquinolones had the lowest CFRs against all of the pathogen populations tested (73.2%-88.9% against E coli and K pneumortfae; 44.5 %-61.9 % against A baumannii and P aeruginosa). Optimal CFR against A baumannii was not achieved with any of the regimens. Against P aeruginosa, high-dose, prolonged-infusion doripenem and meropenem had CFRs of 97.2% to 98.8%, followed by high-dose, prolonged-infusion ceftazidime (93.3%) and cefepime (93.2%). High-dose, prolonged-infusion regimens were associated with increased CFRs for all (beta-lactams by approximately 10% over that of standard 0.5-hour infusion regimens against the nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this model, standard doses of most intravenous (beta-lactam regimens had high probabilities of achieving optimal exposure against Enterobacteriaceae. For nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli such as A baumannii and P aeruginosa, high-dose, prolonged infusions of cefepime, ceftazidime, doripenem, and meropenem had the highest probabilities of achieving bactericidal exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20435246     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  13 in total

1.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients and Guidance for Initial Dosing.

Authors:  Mohammad H Al-Shaer; Michael N Neely; Jiajun Liu; Kartikeya Cherabuddi; Veena Venugopalan; Nathaniel J Rhodes; Kenneth Klinker; Marc H Scheetz; Charles A Peloquin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacodynamic model for β-lactam regimens used in surgical prophylaxis: model-based evaluation of standard dosing regimens.

Authors:  XiangQing Song; MingHui Long
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-08-16

3.  Pharmacodynamic target attainment for various ceftazidime dosing schemes in high-flux hemodialysis.

Authors:  Angela S Loo; Michael Neely; Evan J Anderson; Cybele Ghossein; Milena M McLaughlin; Marc H Scheetz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Doripenem in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Azrin N Abd Rahman; Mohd-Basri Mat-Nor; Helmi Sulaiman; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Christine E Staatz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Multicenter Study of the Relationship between Carbapenem MIC Values and Clinical Outcome of Patients with Acinetobacter Bacteremia.

Authors:  Ya-Sung Yang; Yung-Chih Wang; Shu-Chen Kuo; Chung-Ting Chen; Chang-Pan Liu; Yuag-Meng Liu; Te-Li Chen; Yi-Tzu Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics.

Authors:  Rachel F Eyler; Kristina Shvets
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae testing susceptible to cefepime by reference methods.

Authors:  Renata C Picão; Ronald N Jones; Rodrigo E Mendes; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Pharmacodynamic profiling of antimicrobials against Gram-negative respiratory isolates from Canadian hospitals.

Authors:  Rebecca A Keel; George G Zhanel; Sheryl Zelenitsky; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Extended-infusion cefepime reduces mortality in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

Authors:  Karri A Bauer; Jessica E West; James M O'Brien; Debra A Goff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Clinical and microbiological efficacy of continuous versus intermittent application of meropenem in critically ill patients: a randomized open-label controlled trial.

Authors:  Ivan Chytra; Martin Stepan; Jan Benes; Petr Pelnar; Alexandra Zidkova; Tamara Bergerova; Richard Pradl; Eduard Kasal
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.