OBJECTIVE: We compared long-term outcomes among smokers with and without impaired lung functioning who received brief counseling highlighting their spirometric test results. METHODS: Participants in this analysis all received a brief motivational intervention for smoking cessation including spirometric testing and feedback ( approximately 20 min), were advised to quit smoking, offered free access to a phone-based smoking cessation program, and followed for one year. Outcomes were analyzed for smokers with (n=99) and without (n=168) impaired lung function. RESULTS:Participants with lung impairment reported greater use of self-help cessation materials at 6 months, greater use of non-study-provided counseling services at 6 and 12 months, higher 7-day PPA rates at 6 months, and were more likely to talk with their doctor about their spirometry results. CONCLUSION: Further research is warranted to determine if spirometry feedback has a differential treatment effect among smokers with and without lung impairment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is premature to make practice recommendations based on these data. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We compared long-term outcomes among smokers with and without impaired lung functioning who received brief counseling highlighting their spirometric test results. METHODS:Participants in this analysis all received a brief motivational intervention for smoking cessation including spirometric testing and feedback ( approximately 20 min), were advised to quit smoking, offered free access to a phone-based smoking cessation program, and followed for one year. Outcomes were analyzed for smokers with (n=99) and without (n=168) impaired lung function. RESULTS:Participants with lung impairment reported greater use of self-help cessation materials at 6 months, greater use of non-study-provided counseling services at 6 and 12 months, higher 7-day PPA rates at 6 months, and were more likely to talk with their doctor about their spirometry results. CONCLUSION: Further research is warranted to determine if spirometry feedback has a differential treatment effect among smokers with and without lung impairment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It is premature to make practice recommendations based on these data. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: J O Prochaska; W F Velicer; J S Rossi; M G Goldstein; B H Marcus; W Rakowski; C Fiore; L L Harlow; C A Redding; D Rosenbloom Journal: Health Psychol Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: R E Glasgow; J P Mullooly; T M Vogt; V J Stevens; E Lichtenstein; J F Hollis; H A Lando; H H Severson; K A Pearson; M R Vogt Journal: Addict Behav Date: 1993 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jennifer B McClure; Evette J Ludman; Louis Grothaus; Chester Pabiniak; Julie Richards Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: David A Kaminsky; Theodore Marcy; Anne Dorwaldt; Richard Pinckney; Michael DeSarno; Laura Solomon; John R Hughes Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Francisco Martin-Lujan; Josep L I Piñol-Moreso; Nuria Martin-Vergara; Josep Basora-Gallisa; Irene Pascual-Palacios; Ramon Sagarra-Alamo; Estefania Aparicio Llopis; Maria T Basora-Gallisa; Roser Pedret-Llaberia Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 3.295