OBJECTIVE: To estimate the comparative effectiveness of medical interventions in adults versus children. STUDY DESIGN: We identified from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 1, 2007) meta-analyses with data on at least 1 adult and 1 pediatric randomized trial with binary primary efficacy outcome. For each meta-analysis, we calculated the summary odds ratio of the adult trials and the pediatric trials, respectively; the relative odds ratio (ROR) of the adult versus pediatric odds ratios per meta-analysis; and the summary ROR across all meta-analyses. ROR <1 means that the experimental intervention is more unfavorable in children than adults. RESULTS: Across 128 eligible meta-analyses (1051 adult and 343 pediatric trials), the summary ROR did not show a statistically significant difference between adults and children (0.96; 95% confidence intervals, 0.86 to 1.08). However, in all meta-analyses except for 1, the individual ROR's 95% confidence intervals could not exclude a relative difference in efficacy over 20%. In two-thirds, the relative difference in observed point estimates exceeded 50%. Nine statistically significant discrepancies were identified; 4 of them were also clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment effects are on average similar in adults and children, but available evidence leaves large uncertainty about their relative efficacy. Clinically important discrepancies may occur. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the comparative effectiveness of medical interventions in adults versus children. STUDY DESIGN: We identified from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Issue 1, 2007) meta-analyses with data on at least 1 adult and 1 pediatric randomized trial with binary primary efficacy outcome. For each meta-analysis, we calculated the summary odds ratio of the adult trials and the pediatric trials, respectively; the relative odds ratio (ROR) of the adult versus pediatric odds ratios per meta-analysis; and the summary ROR across all meta-analyses. ROR <1 means that the experimental intervention is more unfavorable in children than adults. RESULTS: Across 128 eligible meta-analyses (1051 adult and 343 pediatric trials), the summary ROR did not show a statistically significant difference between adults and children (0.96; 95% confidence intervals, 0.86 to 1.08). However, in all meta-analyses except for 1, the individual ROR's 95% confidence intervals could not exclude a relative difference in efficacy over 20%. In two-thirds, the relative difference in observed point estimates exceeded 50%. Nine statistically significant discrepancies were identified; 4 of them were also clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment effects are on average similar in adults and children, but available evidence leaves large uncertainty about their relative efficacy. Clinically important discrepancies may occur. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Florence T Bourgeois; Srinivas Murthy; Catia Pinto; Karen L Olson; John P A Ioannidis; Kenneth D Mandl Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-07-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ben Vandermeer; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Marijke C Jansen-van der Weide; Stephanie S Weinreich; Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Dirk Bassler; Ricardo M Fernandes; Lisa Askie; Haroon Saloojee; Paola Baiardi; Susan S Ellenberg; Johanna H van der Lee Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Mufiza Farid-Kapadia; Lisa Askie; Lisa Hartling; Despina Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Roger Soll; David Moher; Martin Offringa Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Patrick Liu; John P A Ioannidis; Joseph S Ross; Sanket S Dhruva; Anita T Luxkaranayagam; Vasilis Vasiliou; Joshua D Wallach Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Peter J Gill; Ann Bayliss; Aubrey Sozer; Francine Buchanan; Karen Breen-Reid; Kim De Castris-Garcia; Mairead Green; Michelle Quinlan; Noel Wong; Shelley Frappier; Katherine Cowan; Carol Chan; Dana Arafeh; Mohammed Rashid Anwar; Colin Macarthur; Patricia C Parkin; Eyal Cohen; Sanjay Mahant Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-04-01